PMI PMI-PBA Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

 A properly written requirement statement should be clear, concise, consistent, complete, and testable. It should specify what the product or service should do, not how it should do it. It should also avoid using ambiguous or vague words that could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders. Among the four options, only option C meets these criteria. Option C is a properly written requirement statement because it clearly and precisely defines the attribute of the pot (the colors) and the possible values for that attribute (yellow, red, brown, blue). It is also consistent with the standard terminology and format for requirement statements, and it is complete and testable, as it can be verified by inspection or measurement. Option A is not a properly written requirement statement because it uses ambiguous and vague words such as “lightweight” and “heat up quickly”. These words do not specify the exact or measurable criteria for the pot’s weight and heating time, and they could mean different things to different stakeholders. Option B is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the conditions or constraints for the pot’s usability in the oven or on the stove. For example, it does not state the maximum temperature or duration that the pot can withstand, or the type of oven or stove that the pot can be used on. Option D is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the requirement for the pot itself, but rather for the company brand. The company brand is not a feature or function of the pot, but rather a marketing or branding strategy. The requirement statement should focus on the pot’s characteristics and capabilities, not on the company’s image or reputation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, How To Write Good Requirements (With Example) - TestLodge Blog

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a requirements review is a formal meeting where the requirements are presented and evaluated by the stakeholders, subject matter experts, and other relevant parties. The purpose of the review is to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, testable, and aligned with the business needs and objectives. To prepare for the review, it would be best for the team to evaluate the requirements and highlight those that cannot be met or need to be deferred, as this would help to identify any gaps, risks, issues, or dependencies that need to be addressed or resolved before proceeding to the design phase. Preparing a test procedure, starting the design, or requesting a contract amendment are not appropriate actions to take before the review, as they could introduce errors, biases, or conflicts in the requirements. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 181-182.

Competitive analysis is a technique to compare the strengths and weaknesses of similar products or services offered by competitors in the same market. Competitive analysis can help to identify opportunities, threats, and gaps in the market, and to develop strategies to increase sales and customer satisfaction. Competitive analysis can be used to identify solutions for the startup company that sells organic vegetable and fruit smoothies by comparing their best-selling juice with similar products offered by competitors. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Benchmarking is a technique to compare the performance of a product, service, or process with a standard or best practice. Trend analysis is a technique to analyze historical data or patterns to forecast future outcomes or behaviors. Focus group is a technique to elicit opinions, preferences, or feedback from a representative group of customers or users. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 51.