Marketing-Cloud-Intelligence Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence Accredited Professional Exam Question and Answers

Option 4 presents two calculated measurements for 'Group Min Cost' with 'MIN' and 'AVG' aggregations. This approach aligns with the client's need for the minimum and average media cost values. 'Group Min Cost 4 MIN' will calculate the minimum media cost across the 'Media Buy Key', while 'Group Min Cost 4 FINAL' will average these minimum costs at the 'Campaign Key' level. This will yield the desired result where minimum costs are calculated at the Media Buy Key level and then averaged at the Campaign Key level.

Since the data sources are linked by shared Media Buy names and all other measurements are mapped to appropriate fields without additional manipulations, each unique Media Buy Name from Google DV360 will pair with its corresponding Media Buy Name in Google Campaign Manager. The number of records in the merged table will equal the number of unique Media Buy Names in Google DV360, provided there is a matching name in Google Campaign Manager. The sample shows 4 unique Media Buy Names in Google DV360, thus resulting in 4 records.

With the uploaded file mapped as a Generic Data Stream type, the unique identifier for a row is the combination of 'Day', 'web_site_key', 'web_site_name', and 'Web_site_source'. As 'Day' is mapped to 'Day', 'web_site_key' to 'Main Generic Entity Key', 'web_site_name' to 'Main Generic Entity Name', and 'Web_site_source' to 'Main Generic Entity Attribute 01', each unique combination of these fields will constitute a separate row.

The provided file has 4 unique combinations of 'Day', 'web_site_key', 'web_site_name', and 'Web_site_source', as each line has a unique 'web_site_key' and 'web_site_name'. Consequently, Marketing Cloud Intelligence will store 4 rows, one for each unique combination.

Based on the Opportunity file and considering the filter dates from January 7th to 10th, the different stages presented are 'Interest', 'Confirmed Interest', and 'Registered'. This makes a total of 3 different stages that would be presented in the pivot table. Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence allows for the creation of pivot tables that can display counts of entities across different dimensions, in this case, Opportunity Stages. Reference to Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence documentation that covers data mapping and pivot table creation would support this conclusion.

The correct table would be Option B. The harmonization process would identify the 'Market' from the campaign or media buy name based on the delimiter and position rules specified in the naming conventions. The harmonized 'Market' would then be matched against the classification file and validation list. If a value does not match the validation list, it would return 'Not Valid', and if it's not present in the classification file, it would return 'Unclassified'. Option B is the only table showing the 'Not Valid' category which aligns with the logic specification provided.

CPC (Cost per Click) is a calculated metric that should be created using a custom measurement based on the formula provided (Cost / Clicks). This calculation does not require a change in the aggregation setting because it is derived from other base metrics that are already aggregated appropriately. In Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence, custom measurements are used to create new metrics from existing data points, and the system will use the underlying data's aggregation to perform the calculation. References: Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence documentation on creating custom measurements and calculated metrics.

Parent-Child configurations in Marketing Cloud Intelligence are used to link different data tables based on shared key values, allowing for the relational organization of data across various streams. While this setup enhances data analysis and reporting by maintaining logical relationships between parent and child tables, it can also introduce performance issues. The complexity increases with the number of relationships and the volume of data, potentially slowing down query processing and data manipulation. Additionally, Parent-Child configurations facilitate the sharing of dimensions and measurements across linked tables, enhancing the data's usability without duplicating it.

In Marketing Cloud Intelligence, joining two files requires a common field to be mapped as the same entity. If "employee_name" is consistently mapped across both data streams, it can serve as the basis for the join, regardless of whether "employee_id" is mapped. The choice of which file serves as the Parent stream depends on the use case and the desired reporting structure, but technically, either could serve as the Parent.

For the given use case, where the Twitter Ads data stream needs to be enriched with classifications from three other sources, the correct implementation would involve creating links between the various fields across these files.

Option A is correct because it shows the correct usage of the fields from the classification files:

"Creative ID" in the Creative Classification file is linked to the "Creative Key" in the Twitter Ads data, allowing for enrichment with creative details.

"Placement ID" in the Placement Classification file is linked to a corresponding field in the Twitter Ads data, allowing for placement details to be added.

"Category" in the Campaign Category Classification file is linked back to "Campaign Category" in the Twitter Ads data, thus enriching the campaign data with the correct categories.

This configuration correctly uses VLOOKUP to enrich the Twitter Ads data stream with additional details from the classification files, aligning with best practices for data integration and enrichment in Marketing Cloud Intelligence.

Since the data sources are linked by shared Media Buy names and all other measurements are mapped to appropriate fields without additional manipulations, each unique Media Buy Name from Google DV360 will pair with its corresponding Media Buy Name in Google Campaign Manager. The number of records in the merged table will equal the number of unique Media Buy Names in Google DV360, provided there is a matching name in Google Campaign Manager. The sample shows 4 unique Media Buy Names in Google DV360, thus resulting in 4 records.

Patterns & Data Classification in Marketing Cloud Intelligence offer several advantages. These include:

Ease of Maintenance (A): Patterns allow for the standardization of data harmonization processes. Once set up, they can be easily maintained and adjusted as needed, without having to manipulate each data stream individually.

Performance (B): By using patterns, data is classified and standardized at ingestion, which can improve the performance of dashboard page loading because the system does not need to perform complex, on-the-fly calculations or transformations.

Scalability (D): Patterns can be applied across multiple data streams consistently, allowing them to scale with the data. This means that as the amount of data grows or as new data sources are added, the same patterns can be reused, ensuring that the data remains harmonized.

Analyzing the Opportunity file with a filter set from January 7th to 11th, Opportunity Key '123AA01' appears under 'Interest' on January 6th and 8th, and under 'Registered' on January 10th. Therefore, during the specified date range, Opportunity Key '123AA01' is associated with both 'Interest' and 'Registered' stages. Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence provides the capability to map and track opportunity stages over time, allowing for historical stage tracking and reporting. This answer aligns with the ability to use pivot tables to filter and display data by specific attributes and timeframes, as outlined in the Salesforce Marketing Cloud Intelligence documentation.

With File A uploaded using the Ads data stream type, the client wishes to create a view incorporating data from Files B & C.

A false connection would occur if VLOOKUP in Data Stream B is used incorrectly to return “Day” and “Installs”. In this scenario, VLOOKUP might inaccurately link data based on MB Name between File B and File A or File C, which do not have a "Day" field to correctly join on. Moreover, "Installs" data in File B doesn't exist, so VLOOKUP cannot correctly return this information. The correct method would be to use the "Media Buy New Name" to link File B and File C since they both have this field, ensuring accurate connection and avoiding data mismatches or false connections.

Variable dimensions in Marketing Cloud Intelligence's data model are flexible and can be associated with multiple entities, forming a many-to-many relationship. These dimensions are configured and stored at the workspace level, allowing for customization and alignment with specific reporting needs and analytics practices.

To create both 'Platform' and 'Line of Business' fields using Patterns in the Harmonization Center without mapping manipulations, the engineer would need to create separate patterns for each data source mentioned. According to the provided images:

One pattern for LinkedIn Ads, to extract the 'Campaign Name' at position 4 for the Platform and 'Media Buy Name' at position 7 for Line of Business.

One pattern for AdRoll, to extract 'Media Buy Name' at position 3 for Platform and at position 2 for Line of Business.

One pattern for Google Analytics, which seems not required for the Platform but could apply if the Line of Business extraction is necessary, although it states N/A.

Hence, a minimum of 3 patterns would be necessary to create the fields required.