SPLK-5001 Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Question and Answers

In an organization, theSecurity Architectis typically responsible for designing new processes or selecting the tools necessary to protect assets that are identified as being at risk. The Security Architect has the expertise to design a comprehensive security solution that addresses the specific needs of the organization, considering various factors like existing infrastructure, threatlandscape, and compliance requirements. They work closely with other roles, such as Security Engineers, to implement these solutions.

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) are artifacts that are used to identify potential malicious activity within a network or system. Common IOCs include domains, IP addresses, and file hashes that are associated with malicious activity. However, a specific password, while potentially sensitive, is not typically considered an IOC because it is more of a credential than an artifact indicating a compromise. IOCs are used to detect and respond to threats, while compromised credentials are a result of those threats.

Tactical intelligenceprovides insights into the specific behaviors, tools, and techniques used by threat actors. When a Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) team produces a report detailing a threat actor’s typical behaviors and intent, they are delivering tactical intelligence. This type of intelligence is actionable and directly supports defenders in identifying, mitigating, and responding to threats in a timely manner.

Tactical Intelligence:

Focuses on the specific, detailed activities of threat actors, such as the Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) they employ.

This intelligence helps in creating defensive strategies, such as refining detection rules, improving incident response plans, and enhancing threat hunting efforts.

Incorrect Options:

A. Operational:Operational intelligence involves real-time information and insights that support ongoing operations, often within a narrow timeframe.

B. Executive:Executive intelligence is high-level and strategic, intended for decision-makers and typically involves summaries rather than detailed technical information.

D. Strategic:Strategic intelligence is long-term and broad in scope, focusing on overall trends and the geopolitical context, rather than specific TTPs.

CTI Frameworks:Standards such as the MITRE ATT&CK framework, which classify tactical intelligence within the spectrum of threat intelligence.

References:

The scenario described is an example ofLeast Frequency of Occurrence Analysis. This threat-hunting technique focuses on identifying events or behaviors that occur infrequently, under the assumption that rare activities could indicate abnormal or suspicious behavior. By filtering out users who log in frequently and focusing on those with rare login attempts, the threat hunter aims to identify potentially suspicious activity that warrants further investigation. This technique is particularly effective in detecting stealthy attacks that might evade more common detection methods.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The MITRE ATT&CK framework categorizes Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) used by attackers. It is a globally accessible knowledge base of adversarial tactics and techniques based on real-world observations, and it is widely used by cybersecurity professionals to understand and defend against various cyber threats.

Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs):

Tactics:The high-level goals that attackers aim to achieve during an attack. For example, gaining initial access to a network.

Techniques:The specific methods used to achieve these tactics, such as phishing or exploiting a vulnerability.

Procedures:The detailed steps and tools that attackers use to implement a technique.

MITRE ATT&CK Framework:MITRE ATT&CK organizes these TTPs into a matrix that reflects different stages of an attack lifecycle, from initial access to exfiltration. The framework helps security teams by:

Mapping Detection and Defense:Organizations can map their existing detection capabilities against the ATT&CK matrix to identify gaps.

Threat Hunting:Security teams use the framework to guide their threat-hunting activities, focusing on specific techniques associated with known adversaries.

Incident Response:During incident response, analysts can use the ATT&CK framework to understand the behaviors exhibited by an attacker, which helps in creating effective containment and eradication strategies.

Why MITRE ATT&CK:Unlike compliance-focused frameworks like NIST 800-53 or ISO 27000, which provide security controls and best practices, MITRE ATT&CK is specifically focused on the behavior of adversaries. This focus makes it an invaluable resource for understanding how attacks unfold and how to counteract them.

MITRE ATT&CK Website:The official site provides detailed information on each tactic and technique, along with examples of how they have been used in real-world attacks.

Threat Intelligence Platforms:Many platforms integrate with MITRE ATT&CK, providing enhanced detection and response capabilities by mapping security events to the framework.

Security Research Papers:Numerous papers and reports analyze specific attacks using the ATT&CK framework, offering insights into its practical applications in cybersecurity defense.

References:MITRE ATT&CK is a foundational tool in modern cybersecurity, providing a detailed and actionable understanding of adversary behaviors that can be directly applied to enhance an organization's defensive posture.

TheEnterprise Security Content Update (ESCU)app is a pre-packaged app that delivers security content and detections on a regular, ongoing basis for Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) and Splunk SOAR. ESCU provides regular updates with new correlation searches, dashboards, and other content that help organizations stay up-to-date with the latest threats and detection techniques. This app is specifically designed to enhance the capabilities of Splunk ES by providing out-of-the-box security content that can be customized and used immediately.

A threat hunt is an iterative process where a hypothesis is developed and tested against data in an environment to detect the presence of threats or adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Understanding the Hypothesis:

The hypothesis here is that a threat actor might userundll32for proxy execution of malicious code and leverage Cobalt Strike for command and control (C2).

The hunt would involve looking for indicators of these specific activities in logs and artifacts like Sysmon logs, netflow, IDS alerts, and EDR data.

Search and Analysis:

The threat hunter performed an extensive search across multiple log sources and found no evidence of Cobalt Strike or the specific malicious activities hypothesized.

Evaluation of the Hypothesis:

If the hypothesis were proven true,the presence of Cobalt Strike or related artifacts would be detected.

However, the hypothesis was not proven; instead, the hunt provided strong evidence that Cobalt Strike and the hypothesized malicious activities are not present.

Successful Threat Hunt:

The goal of threat hunting is not always to find a threat but to gain confidence in the security posture of the environment.

Outcome Dcorrectly identifies that the hunt was successful because it provided strong evidence supporting the absence of the hypothesized threat, thus improving confidence in the organization's security.

MITRE ATT&CK Framework:Understanding how threat actors utilize tactics like Cobalt Strike for C2 can be aligned with TTPs in the framework, helping to build effective hypotheses.

Threat Hunting Resources:Books like "The Threat Hunter's Handbook" often describe scenarios where proving a negative (i.e., the absence of a threat) is a valid and successful outcome of a hunt.

Outcome of the Threat Hunt:References:

In Splunk, field extractions are essential for transforming raw log data into structured fields that are easier to work with during analysis. When the question refers to an analyst identifying helpful information in the raw logs that assists them in determining suspicious activity, the most effective way to streamline this process is throughfield extraction. This allows the Splunk system to automatically parse and tag the necessary data, making it more accessible for searches, dashboards, and alerts.

Let’s break down whyoption A: Create a field extraction for this informationis the best approach:

Field Extraction Overview:

Field extraction is a process within Splunk that takes unstructured log data and converts it into structured fields.

This makes it possible to directly query and display these fields, allowing analysts to quickly find and use relevant data in their investigations.

For example, if the logs contain IP addresses, user IDs, file names, or activity types, extracting these fields enables the analyst to filter and correlate data much more effectively without manually scanning the raw logs.

Why Field Extraction?

In this case, the question suggests that the raw logs contain information that helps determine whether activity is malicious. By creating field extractions for the relevant data points, analysts can use those structured fields to build queries and visualizations, drastically speeding up analysis time.

Analysts can write custom Splunk queries to isolate events that meet specific conditions, such as matching specific cloud sharing activities associated with risk notables.

Field extraction improves not only real-time analysis but also supports retrospective analysis and incident correlation across multiple events.

Comparison to Other Options:

Option B: Add this information to the risk message– While adding more context to a risk message could be useful for reviewing individual alerts, it doesn’t improve the efficiency of log analysis. The analyst still would need to go back and manually inspect raw logs for more detailed data.

Option C: Create another detection for this information– Creating additional detections adds more rules, but doesn't solve the fundamental issue of having raw logs that aren’t easily searchable. You can only build effective detections when you have structured data available.

Option D: Allowlist more events based on this information– Allowlisting is generally used to reduce noise or irrelevant logs, but it doesn't help extract the necessary details for analysis. It may reduce unnecessary alerts, but won’t help analyze the suspicious events that do arise.

Cybersecurity Defense Analyst Best Practices:

Field extractionsshould be created for any important log source or data point, especially when handling complex or multi-part log entries (e.g., cloud sharing logs). This ensures logs are searchable and actionable, allowing for faster identification of anomalies and malicious activity.

Analysts should collaborate with engineers to ensure these extractions are tuned and validated. The extraction should be tailored to isolate the fields most relevant for identifying suspicious activity.

Once fields are extracted, analysts can create dashboards, real-time alerts, or retrospective searches based on the structured data for more effective incident response.

References:

Splunk Documentation: Field Extraction in Splunk

Cybersecurity defense techniques emphasize the importance of making log data actionable, which aligns with common practices in Incident Detection & Response (IDR) environments. Structured data is key to this effort, and field extraction is a critical part of transforming raw logs into useful intelligence

Theforeachcommand in Splunk is used to iterate over a list of fields that match a wildcard expression and apply a subsearch or function to each of them. This is particularly useful when you need to perform an operation across multiple fields dynamically identified by a wildcard pattern. None of the other options (rex,makeresults, ortransaction) are designed for this specific purpose. Theforeachcommand allows for flexible and efficient processing of multiple fields without having to explicitly name them all.

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Personal Data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. An individual's address, combined with their first and last name, clearly identifies a person, making it Personal Data under GDPR. The other options provided do not meet the GDPR criteria for Personal Data: the birth date of an unidentified user does not identify a person, the name of a deceased individual is not covered under GDPR, and a company’s registration number pertains to an entity rather than a natural person.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The primary difference between a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack and a Denial of Service (DoS) attack is in the source of the attack. ADDoSattack involves multiple compromised systems (often part of a botnet) attacking a single target, overwhelming it with traffic or requests. In contrast, aDoSattack typically involves a single source attacking the target. The goal of both attacks is to make a service unavailable, but DDoS attacks are usually more difficult to defend against because of their distributed nature.

According to Splunk CIM (Common Information Model) documentation, thesrc_userfield in the Authentication Data Model represents the user who initiated an action, including privilege escalation. This field is used to track the source user responsible for generating an authentication event, which is critical in understanding and responding to potential security incidents involving privilege escalation. The other fields likedest_userorusernamehave different roles, focusing on the target of the action or the general username involved.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

When creating performant searches in Splunk, it is a best practice to utilize specific fields to return only the data that is required. This approach minimizes the amount of data processed and speeds up search performance. By explicitly specifying the fields of interest using commands likefields, you reduce the overhead on Splunk’s processing engine, leading to faster and more efficient queries. In contrast, using wildcards or overly broad searches can lead to slower performance due to the increased data volume being processed.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The main difference between hypothesis-driven and data-driven threat hunting lies in the approach. Inhypothesis-drivenhunting, the hunter starts with a theory or hypothesis about what kind of malicious activity might be occurring and then searches the data to confirm or refute that hypothesis. On the other hand,data-drivenhunting involves sifting through existing datasets to uncover patterns, anomalies, or activities that were not initially suspected. Hypothesis-driven approaches are more focused and often guided by threat intelligence or knowledge of attacker behaviors, while data-driven approaches rely on broad data analysis to identify unexpected threats.

In Splunk, therexcommand is used to extract fields from raw event data using regular expressions. This command allows analysts to dynamically extract additional fields as part of a search pipeline, which is crucial for creating new fields during search time based on specific patterns found in the log data. Therexcommand is highly flexible and powerful, making it essential for refining and manipulating data in a Splunk environment. The other options (fields,regex,eval) have their uses, butrexis specifically designed for dynamic field extraction.

NetFlow data is a powerful data source for monitoring and analyzing network traffic patterns within an organization. It provides detailed information about the flow of data between devices on a network, including source and destination IP addresses, ports, and protocols. By analyzing NetFlow data, security analysts can detect unusual communication patterns that may indicate malicious activity, such as lateral movement, data exfiltration, or communication with command and control servers. Other options like EDS (Endpoint Detection Systems), Email, and IAM (Identity and Access Management) are also valuable, but NetFlow is specifically designed for network traffic analysis.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form