PDII Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II ( Plat-Dev-301 ) Question and Answers

When a data table experiences slow performance during filtering, the root cause is often "non-selective" queries that result in full table scans. In Salesforce, a query is selective when it uses an indexed field in the WHERE clause and filters down to a small percentage of the total records (typically 10% of the first million).

Option D is the correct strategy. By ensuring that the filter fields (such as a Status or Category) are either standard indexed fields or custom fields marked as "External ID" or "Unique" (which creates a custom index), the Query Optimizer can quickly locate the relevant rows. This significantly reduces the database processing time and the "Time to First Byte" (TTFB) returned to the Lightning component.

Option C might seem attractive for small datasets, but it is not scalable; if the org has 50,000 records, returning all of them to the client will crash the browser's heap memory. Option B (setStorable) is an Aura-specific concept and is replaced by @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true) in LWC, but even caching doesn't help if the initial query itself is slow. Option A (SOSL) is for text searching across multiple objects and is generally less efficient than a targeted SOQL query for specific field filtering. Using a selective SOQL query ensures the component remains fast as data volume grows.

For high-volume, automated standard email communications, Email Alerts with Flow Builder (Option B) is the most scalable and maintainable solution. Salesforce imposes strict limits on the number of "Single" emails sent via Apex (typically 5,000 per 24 hours). However, emails 5sent via Workflow Rules, Process Builder, or Flow6 Builder (Email Alerts) have a much higher daily limit (2,000,000 per org).

To meet the requirement of 10,000 emails per day, an Apex-based solution using SingleEmailMessage() (Option D) would likely hit the daily limit and cause transaction failures. MassEmailMessage() (Option C) is generally intended for manual mass mailing to Contacts or Leads and is not optimized for automated, per-record trigger logic. While Batch Apex (Option A) could process many records, the underlying SingleEmailMessage limit would still apply.

By using an Email Alert triggered by a Record-Triggered Flow, the developer leverages the platform's high-volume email engine. This approach is declarative, requires no custom code, is easier for administrators to maintain, and comfortably handles the 10,000 daily email requirement without risking governor limit exceptions. It also ensures the "criteria evaluation" happens within the standard Flow entry conditions.

==========

14

In Sales15force, SOSL (Search) queries behave differently than SOQL (Database) queries during unit tests. Because the search index is not updated in real-time during a test transaction, a SOSL FIND statement will consistently return an empty list, even if records matching the criteria were just inserted within the same test method. This leads to the assertion failure seen in the developer's code.

To overcome this, Salesforce provides the Test.setFixedSearchResults() method (Option C). This method allows a developer to define exactly which record IDs should be returned by any SOSL query executed during the test. When Test.setFixedSearchResults(list_of_ids) is called, the platform bypasses the actual search engine and returns the specified records. This ensures that the test remains deterministic and can verify the logic that processes the search results.

Option A (SeeAllData=true) is a poor practice and doesn't guarantee the search index will be ready. Option B (Test.loadData) and Option D (@testSetup) are for data creation but do not solve the underlying SOSL indexing limitation. Using setFixedSearchResults is the standard, documented way to test SOSL functionality in the Apex environment.

==========

28

When dealing with External Users (Community/Experience Cloud users), standard sharing mechanisms like Role Hierarchies o29ften do not apply, especially for high-volume Customer Community licenses which do not use the Role Hierarchy at all.

Sharing Sets (Option B) are specifically designed to grant external users access to records associated with their Account or Contact. A Sharing Set allows an administrator to define a simple mapping: for example, "Grant access to Cases where the Case's Account matches the User's Account." This is the most efficient and scalable way to provide external partners visibility into records relevant to them without using complex Apex code.

While Apex managed sharing (Option A) could technically work, it is much more complex to maintain and is only available for "Customer Community Plus" or "Partner" licenses. Criteria-based sharing rules (Option D) are typically used for internal users or broad groups, not for granular, account-specific access for individual external partners. Sharing Sets provide a high-performance, declarative solution for controlling external record visibility.

In Salesforce, when organization-wide defaults (OWD) are set to Private, users only have access to records they own or those shared with them through the role hierarchy or sharing rules. In this scenario, the requirement is to grant access dynamically based on a value in a lookup field (Quality_Controller__c). Criteria-based sharing rules (Option D) are generally used for field values that are static or belong to 1a predefined set, but they cannot dynamically target a specific user identified in a lookup field on the record itself.2

Apex managed sharing i3s the optimal solution for this requirement. It allows developers to programmatically create sharing records (shares) to grant access to specific users or groups. When a record is created or the Quality_Controller__c field is updated, an Apex trigger can insert a record into the Order__Share object. This share record would specify the UserOrGroupId as the ID from the lookup field and the AccessLevel as 'Read'. This approach is highly flexible and ensures that as the quality controller changes, the sharing access is updated accordingly. User managed sharing (Option A), often referred to as manual sharing, requires manual intervention by the record owner and cannot be fully "automatic" in the context of complex business logic without Apex. Therefore, Apex managed sharing provides the necessary automation and precision for record-level security based on dynamic lookup values.

==========

In Visualforce, the component is specifically designed to provide user feedback during asynchronous (AJAX) operations. When an or initiates a request to the server, there is a delay while the server processes the logic and returns the updated data. To prevent users from clicking the button multiple times or to simply inform them that the system is working, developers use .

This tag allows you to define two facets: startText (or a start facet) and stopText (or a stop facet). By linking the status attribute of the to the id of the , the page will automatically toggle between these states. For example, while the button is processing, the status can display "Processing..." or a loading spinner, and once the action is complete, it can return to being hidden or display a "Completed" message.

Option B is used for timed, repeated requests. Option C is for displaying validation or system errors. Option D is used to add AJAX support to other components (like a picklist) but doesn't manage the display state of the request itself. Therefore, is the standard tool for managing UI state during the request-response lifecycle in Visualforce.

==========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The lightning-layout grid system uses a 12-column model. To achieve a responsive design, developers use attributes that target different screen breakpoints.

size: Defines the default size (usually targeting the smallest devices if no other attributes are present).

medium-device-size: Targets tablets and small desktops.

large-device-size: Targets large monitors.

To show one column on a phone, an item must occupy all 12 columns (size="12"). To show two columns on a tablet/desktop, each item must occupy 6 columns (medium-device-size="6").

Option A correctly implements this. While small-device-size exists, the size attribute itself typically serves as the baseline for small devices. If you set size="12" and medium-device-size="6", the component will "stack" on phones and sit side-by-side on anything larger.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 25110 words of Explana12tion:

The Salesforce Lightning Inspector is a Chrome DevTools extension used to investigate and optimize Lightning components. When a page fails to show the most current reference data, the issue often lies within the client-side caching mechanism. The Storage tab (A) is specifically designed to help developers inspect the client-side data stores used by the Lightning Data Service (LDS) and custom component caching.

In this tab, a developer can view the contents of the various storage caches (such as actions, records, and lists). It allows the developer to see exactly what data is currently stored in the cache, its expiration time, and whether the data is being retrieved from the server or served directly from the cache. By analyzing the Storage tab, a developer can determine if a component is incorrectly holding onto "stale" data instead of refreshing from the server.

The Actions tab (C) is useful for monitoring the status of server-side controller actions, and the Event Log (B) tracks the sequence of application and component events. However, for a data consistency issue specifically related to caching, the Storage tab provides the most direct visibility into the underlying cause. Using this tool, a developer can verify if the cache invalidation logic is working correctly or if the storage limits are causing unexpected data eviction.

==========

Co6mprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation:

To prevent race conditions in Salesforce, where two or more concurrent transactions attempt to update the same record simultaneously, a developer must implement record locking. In SOQL, this is achieved using the FOR UPDATE keyword.

When a query includes the FOR UPDATE clause, the platform places an exclusive lock on the returned records for the duration of the transaction. If another process attempts to update these records or lock them with its own FOR UPDATE query, it will be forced to wait until the first transaction completes (commits or rolls back). If the lock is not released within 10 seconds, the second process will receive a QueryException.

Option A is the correct syntax to ensure that the Credit_Memo__c records are "reserved" for the current logic, preventing other threads from interfering with the newAmount calculation or update. Option B (USING SCOPE) is used for filtering records based on predefined ownership scopes like "My Terrace." Options C and D (FOR REFERENCE and FOR VIEW) are used to update the "Last Referenced" or "Last Viewed" timestamps on records, respectively, and do not provide the row-level locking required to prevent data concurrency issues or race conditions.

To build a responsive user interface in Lightning Web Components (LWC), developers rely on the layout system provided by the Lightning Design System (SLDS). This system is primarily implemented through two tightly coupled components: lightning-layout and lightning-layout-item.

lightning-layout acts as a flexible container (a flexbox wrapper). It allows developers to arrange child components in a row or column and manage horizontal and vertical alignment. It provides the overall structure for the grid. lightning-layout-item is the child component that resides within a lightning-layout. It is responsible for defining the actual proportions of the content across different breakpoints (small, medium, and large devices) using attributes like size, small-device-size, medium-device-size, and large-device-size.

Together, these two components allow a developer to specify exactly how much space a piece of content should occupy depending on the user's screen size. For example, a sidebar might occupy 100% of the width on a phone but only 25% on a desktop. lightning-input-location is a specific input field for geolocation data, and lightning-navigation is a service used for page routing; neither is involved in the visual responsiveness or structural layout of the component. Therefore, options B and D are the essential building blocks for responsive design.

==========

In a private sharing model, access is restricted to the owner and those above them in the hierarchy. When a specific user is identified in a lookup field (like Event_Reviewer__c), standard sharing rules cannot dynamically grant access to that specific individual because sharing rules only target Roles, Public Groups, or Territories.1

The solution is Apex Managed Sharing (Option A). By using an after insert (and likely after update) trigger, the developer can pro2grammatically create records in the object's "Share" table (e.g., Convention_Attendee__Share). Each share record specifies the UserOrGroupId (from the lookup field), the AccessLevel ('Edit' for Read/Write), and a RowCause (Apex Sharing Reason).

The "After" trigger is required because the ID of the Convention_Attendee__c record must exist before a Share record can be associated with it. "Before" triggers (Option B) are used for field updates on the record itself, not for creating related sharing records. Options C and D are not viable because they cannot dynamically reference a User ID stored within a field on the record itself. Apex Managed Sharing provides the most granular and automated way to handle this dynamic security requirement.

To optimize the performance of a Visualforce page that uses external assets, Static Resources (Option5 A) is the pl6atform-native best practice. Static resources allow you to upload content such as archives (.zip or .jar files), images, stylesheets, and JavaScript files that you can reference in a Visualforce page.

The primary benefits of using Static Resources over other methods (like hosting files externally or hardcoding styles) include:

Caching: Salesforce serves static resources from a Content Delivery Network (CDN). This means once a user's browser loads the JavaScript or CSS file, it is cached locally, significantly reducing page load times for subsequent requests.

Relative Referencing: Using the $Resource global variable (e.g., {!URLFOR($Resource.MyZipFile, 'styles/main.css')}) ensures that your page references the correct version of the file across different environments (Sandbox, Production) without changing hardcoded URLs.

Efficiency: By bundling related files into a single ZIP archive as a static resource, you reduce the number of HTTP requests the browser must make to render the page.

Options B and D are related to AJAX and JavaScript-to-Apex communication, and Option C is a component used for rendering data tables; none of these address the storage or caching of external front-end assets.

In Salesforce Apex, a Database.Savepoint allows a developer to define a point in a transaction that can be returned to if an error occurs, effectively undoing database changes. However, it is critical to understand what is—and is not—affected by a rollback. According to the platform specifications, while database records (DML operations) are reverted to their state at the time the savepoint was set, static variables are not reverted (Option B). Static variables persist across the entire transaction regardless of rollbacks, which is why they are commonly used as "recursion guards" to track if a trigger has already fired.

Other options are incorrect due to the strict "stack" nature of savepoints. Savepoints must be rolled back in reverse chronological order; rolling back to an earlier savepoint invalidates any savepoints created after it (Option A). Furthermore, a savepoint variable is only valid within the specific execution context in which it was created. You cannot pass a savepoint reference across different trigger invocations or asynchronous boundaries (Option D). Finally, while the rollback itself isn't a DML statement, the operations performed between setting a savepoint and rolling back still count toward DML and CPU governor limits (Option C). Understanding that memory state (static variables) remains unchanged during a database rollback is essential for debugging complex transactional logic.

==========

38

In Salesforce, all triggers that fire as a result of an initial DML operation ru39n within the same execution context and the same transaction. This means that all governor limits—such as the limit of 10,000 records processed by DML statements—are shared across the entire chain of events.

In this scenario, the transaction begins with the update of 200 Accounts. The Account trigger then attempts to update 10,000 related Contacts (50 Contacts per Account across 200 Accounts). This update of 10,000 Contacts then fires the Contact trigger, which attempts to update 10,000 related Campaign Members. When the system attempts to process these updates, the total number of records processed via DML in a single transaction will exceed the platform limit of 10,000 rows.

Even though the Account update is only 200 records, the subsequent cascading updates (10,000 Contacts + 10,000 Campaign Members) bring the total DML count to 20,200. This triggers a LimitException, and because Apex transactions are atomic, the entire operation will fail and roll back. To resolve this, the developer would need to handle these updates asynchronously (e.g., using Batch Apex or Queueable) to split the cascading updates into separate transactions with their own sets of governor limits.

==========

In Visualforce, the standard behavior for an is to perform a full page postback. To convert this into an asynchronous (AJAX) request that only updates a specific portion of the page, the developer must use the reRender attribute (D). By setting reRender="opportunityList" on the command button, the developer instructs the platform to capture the server's response and update only the DOM element with that specific ID, rather than refreshing the entire browser window.

While Option C (returning null from the search method) is a requirement for staying on the same page, it does not prevent the full refresh by itself. Option A () is used to limit which part of the form's data is sent to the server for processing (to avoid validation errors on unrelated fields), but it does not control which part of the page is re-drawn on the client. Option B () is a way to call Apex from JavaScript but doesn't solve the button's refresh behavior directly. Implementing reRender is the standard and most efficient way to achieve the "partial refresh" UX in Visualforce, significantly improving the perceived performance and user experience by reducing the amount of data and UI flickering during search operations.

==========

When managing integrations where endpoints (URLs) or authentication details are subject to change, Named Credentials (Option A) provide the most maintainable and secure solution. A Named Credential specifies the URL of a callout endpoint and its required authentication parameters in one definition. By referencing a Named Credential in Apex code (e.g., callout:MyExternalSystem/path), the developer abstracts the literal URL away fro1m the code itself.

If the URL changes, an administrator can simply update the Named Credential record in the Setup menu without requiring a code deployment or a change to the Apex class. Additionally, Named Credentials automatically handle the callout overhead for Remote Site Settings; you do not need to maintain a separate entry in Remote Site Settings if a Named Credential is used.

Connected Apps (Option B) are used to allow external applications to connect into Salesforce, not for making outbound callouts. Session IDs (Option D) are authentication tokens and do not manage endpoint URLs. By utilizing Named Credentials, developers ensure that their integration logic remains decoupled from environment-specific configurations, facilitating smoother transitions between sandboxes and production environments.

==========

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 25042 words o43f Explanation:

In Lightning Web Components, external JavaScript libraries or CSS files stored in Static Resources must be imported using a specific syntax. The correct way to reference the resource URL is through the @salesforce/resourceUrl scoped module. Option A correctly follows this convention: import resourceName from '@salesforce/resourceUrl/staticResourceName'. This statement provides the component with the URL string pointing to the resource.

It is important to note that the import statement only gives you the URL of the file. To actually load and execute the JavaScript within the component, you would then need to use the loadScript function from the lightning/platformResourceLoader module, typically within the renderedCallback() lifecycle hook.

Option B is incorrect because resource imports are default imports, not named imports. Option C uses Aura framework syntax ($A.get), which is not supported in LWC. Option D uses a syntax that resembles Aura's ltng:require tag, which does not exist in the LWC template syntax. Therefore, Option A is the essential first step for any LWC to identify and eventually load a static resource.

==========

This scenario highlights a common conflict in multi-admin environments known as "the last delivery wins" problem. When multiple administrators work in isolated sandboxes, they are essentially working on different versions of the same metadata. If Admin A adds a field to a Page Layout and deploys it, and then Admin B—who does not have Admin A's changes in their sandbox—deploys their own version of that same Page Layout, Admin B's deployment will overwrite Admin A's changes in Production (Statement B). In the Metadata API (which Change Sets use), Page Layouts are treated as single files; you cannot "merge" them via a Change Set; you can only replace the destination file entirely.

To resolve this, the team needs a more sophisticated deployment pipeline. Statement D is the correct resolution: the company should implement a "Staging" or "Integration" sandbox. In this model, all admins deploy their Change Sets to a single unified sandbox first. This allows them to identify conflicts and "merge" their changes (manually or via source control) before a final, combined deployment is made to Production. Statement A is technically incorrect because Change Sets cannot "delete" components; they can only overwrite or add. Statement C is a myth; Page Layouts can be safely deployed, but only if the underlying fields and security settings are also included and coordinated.

In Salesforce Apex, a @RemoteAction method must be defined as static. Static methods belong to the class itself rather than to a specific instance of the class. Therefore, when writing a unit test to verify the behavior of a RemoteAction, the method should be called using the class name notation (ClassName.methodName) rather than by instantiating the class first.

Option D correctly demonstrates the standard way to invoke a static method in Apex: Account a = MyRemoter.getAccount('TestAccount');. Because the method is static, it does not require the new keyword or a constructor to be called. Option A is incorrect because it attempts to call a static method on an instance variable (remote.getAccount), which is considered an illegal or improper reference in Apex. Option B is incorrect because it treats the RemoteAction like an instance method and assumes a non-existent constructor that takes a String. Option C is incorrect because it uses an undefined variable controller.

By calling the method statically in the test, the developer correctly simulates how the Visualforce Remoting engine calls the method from JavaScript at runtime. The assertion System.assertEquals then verifies that the record retrieved from the database matches the expected name, ensuring the search logic is functioning correctly.

When building global applications in Lightning Web Components (LWC), developers should never hardcode locale-specific logic. Salesforce provides a robust Internationalization (i18n) service that exposes the current user's regional settings directly to the JavaScript controller.9

The correct approach is to import the @salesforce/i18n module (Option D). This module contains several properties that are automatically populated based on the logged-in user's Salesforce profile settings. Specifically, the firstDayOfWeek property 10returns an integer (0 for Sunday, 1 for Monday, etc.) that corresponds to the cultural standard of the user's locale.

Using this built-in property is superior to other methods because:

It requires no Apex callouts or SOQL queries (unlike Option A and C).

It is automatically maintained by Salesforce; as global standards change, the platform updates the i18n values, ensuring the component remains compliant without developer intervention.

It avoids the maintenance overhead of creating custom metadata (Option B) to map every possible locale to a starting day.

By leveraging @salesforce/i18n/firstDayOfWeek, the developer ensures the calendar component is truly global and provides a native, localized experience for every user regardless of their country.

9

The "Customer Community Plus" license is distinct because it supports advanced sharing features, including 10Apex Managed Sharing. In a Private sharing model, a standard community user can only see records they own or those shared with them via the role hierarchy (if applicable). Since the requirement involves granting access based on a complex relationsh11ip defined in a junction object, standard sharing rules are insufficient because they cannot "walk" the relations12hip of the junction object to determine access.

Apex Managed Sharing (Option A) allows a developer to bridge this gap. A trigger can be written on the junction object. When a relationship is created between a Contact (Community User) and an Account (Department), the trigger can insert a record into the AccountShare table (or the share table of the container object). This share record explicitly grants the User 'Read' access to the related records.

Option C is an "anti-pattern" because using without sharing to bypass security is a security risk and doesn't actually grant record access for standard platform features; it only hides the restriction within that specific page. Option B and D are UI-level solutions and do not address the underlying record-level security (sharing) required for a Private OWD model. Apex Managed Sharing provides a robust, programmatic way to enforce complex, data-driven security requirements in a Community environment.

==========

Managing "Trigger Kill Switches" is a critical requirement for data migration. The most "extendable" and platform-standard approach is using a Hierarchy Custom Setting (Option C).

A hierarchy setting allows for different values at the Organization, Profile, and User levels. A developer can create a checkbox field called Disable_Opportunity_Trigger__c. In the trigger, the code would check: if (MySettings__c.getInstance().Disable_Opportunity_Trigger__c) return;. During a mass data load, the administrator can enable this checkbox specifically for the integration user or the specific administrator performing the load. Because it is a hierarchy, it doesn't affect standard users.

This approach is superior to hard-coding Profile IDs (Option A) because IDs change between environments. It is also better than List Custom Settings (Option D) because it provides the automatic "fallback" logic (User > Profile > Org) that makes management much simpler. Validation rules (Option B) would cause the trigger to fail with an exception, which could stop the entire data load transaction, whereas the Custom Setting approach allows the trigger to "gracefully" skip its logic and allow the Opportunity to be saved without creating a Contract.

The provided code violates two fundamental Salesforce Apex best practices: bulkification and efficient use of trigger contexts. First, the code performs a SOQL query inside a loop (setPricingStructure is called inside the trigger's for loop). This is a critical performance issue because it consumes one SOQL query per record in the transaction. If 200 opportunities are updated at once, the code will hit the governor limit of 100 SOQL queries and throw an exception. To optimize this, the developer should use a Map or List to query all necessary Pricing_Structure__c records once, outside the loop (Option C), and then reference that collection during processing.

Second, the code is running in a before trigger context. In a before insert or before update trigger, any changes made directly to the records in Trigger.new are automatically saved to the database when the trigger completes without the need for an explicit DML update statement. Including an update thisOpp; statement (Option A) is not only redundant but dangerous, as it can trigger a recursive loop where the update re-fires the same trigger, leading to a "Maximum stack depth reached" error. By removing the DML statement and bulkifying the query, the code becomes more efficient, scalable, and compliant with platform governor limits.

==========