CISM Certified Information Security Manager Question and Answers

The best way to determine corrective actions after a major information security incident is to conduct a postmortem assessment, which is a systematic and structured review of the incident, its causes, its impacts, and its lessons learned. A postmortem assessment can help to identify the root causes of the incident, the strengths and weaknesses of the incident response process, the gaps and deficiencies in the security controls, and the opportunities for improvement and remediation. A postmortem assessment can also help to document the recommendations and action plans for preventing or minimizing the recurrence of similar incidents in the future.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response, Subsection: Postincident Activities, Page 211.

According to the NIST SP 800-61 Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, the type of confirmed incident is one of the most important criteria for choosing a containment strategy, as different types of incidents may require different levels of urgency, scope, and impact1. For example, a denial-of-service attack may require a different containment strategy than a ransomware attack or a data breach.

References = 1: NIST SP 800-61: 3.1. Choosing a Containment Strategy2

The most important information for influencing management’s support of information security is an demonstration of alignment with the business strategy because it shows how information security contributes to the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and adds value to the organization’s performance and competitiveness. An identification of the overall threat landscape is not very important because it does not indicate how information security addresses or mitigates the threats or risks. A report of a successful attack on a competitor is not very important because it does not indicate how information security prevents or responds to such attacks. An identification of organizational risks is not very important because it does not indicate how information security manages or reduces the risks. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

Assigning ownership is the best way to enable an effective information asset classification process, as it establishes the authority and responsibility for the information asset and its protection. The owner of the information asset should be involved in the classification process, as they have the best knowledge of the value, sensitivity, and criticality of the asset, as well as the impact of its loss or compromise. The owner should also ensure that the asset is properly labeled, handled, and secured according to its classification level. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

 The primary basis for determining the value of assets should be the business cost when assets are not available. This is because the value of assets is not only determined by their acquisition or replacement cost, but also by their contribution to the organization’s business objectives and processes. The business cost when assets are not available reflects the potential impact of losing or compromising the assets on the organization’s operations, performance, reputation, and compliance. The business cost when assets are not available can be estimated by conducting a business impact analysis (BIA), which identifies the criticality, dependencies, and recovery requirements of the assets. By using the business cost when assets are not available as the primary basis for determining the value of assets, the organization can prioritize the protection and management of the assets according to their importance and risk level. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 64, page 65.

The most important consideration is the current security awareness level of employees (C). CISM emphasizes that culture change must start from an understanding of current behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge gaps. Benchmarking (A), regulations (B), and formal frameworks (D) provide structure, but culture is driven by people. Tailoring initiatives to the existing awareness level increases adoption and effectiveness, leading to sustainable risk reduction.

Information security awareness training and campaigns are the best way to enable the desired information security culture within an organization because they help to educate, motivate and influence the behavior and attitude of the employees towards information security. They also help to raise the awareness of the risks, threats and best practices of information security among the staff and stakeholders.

References = Organizational Culture for Information Security: A Systemic Perspective on the Articulation of Human, Cultural and Social Systems, CISM Exam Content Outline

The best approach for selecting security controls is to assess the effectiveness of each control in reducing residual risk (B). CISM emphasizes that control selection must be risk-based and outcome-focused, with the primary objective of reducing risk to within the organization’s defined risk appetite. When multiple controls are available, the information security manager should evaluate how well each option mitigates the identified risk—specifically data exfiltration—and determine the resulting residual risk after implementation.

Implementing controls solely because they are recommended by a framework (A) may not adequately address the organization’s specific threat scenario or business context. Prioritizing controls based on ease of implementation or available resources (C) shifts focus away from risk reduction and may result in insufficient protection. Cost-benefit analysis (D) is an important supporting activity, but in CISM it is secondary to understanding risk reduction effectiveness.

CISM guidance consistently states that security controls should be selected based on their ability to reduce risk exposure in a measurable and meaningful way, ensuring alignment with business objectives, risk tolerance, and governance expectations.

Redirecting the attacker’s traffic is a viable containment strategy for a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack because it helps to divert the malicious traffic away from the target server and reduce the impact of the attack. A DDoS attack is an attempt by attackers to overwhelm a server or a network with a large volume of requests or packets, preventing legitimate users from accessing the service or resource. Redirecting the attacker’s traffic is a technique that involves changing the DNS settings or routing tables to send the attacker’s traffic to another destination, such as a sinkhole, a honeypot, or a scrubbing center. A sinkhole is a server that absorbs and discards the malicious traffic. A honeypot is a decoy server that mimics the target server and collects information about the attacker’s behavior and techniques. A scrubbing center is a service that filters out the malicious traffic and forwards only the legitimate traffic to the target server. Redirecting the attacker’s traffic helps to contain the DDoS attack by reducing the load on the target server and preserving its availability and performance. Therefore, redirecting the attacker’s traffic is the correct answer.

The first thing that an information security manager should do upon confirming a privileged user’s unauthorized modifications to a security application is to enforce the security configuration and require the change to be reverted. This is because the unauthorized modification may have compromised the security of the application and the data it protects, and may have violated the security policies and standards of the organization. By enforcing the security configuration and requiring the change to be reverted, the information security manager can restore the security posture of the application and prevent further unauthorized modifications.

Ensuring security requirements are defined at the request-for-proposal (RFP) stage is the most effective security outcome in an organization’s contract management process because it establishes and communicates the security expectations and obligations for both parties, and enables the organization to evaluate and select the most suitable and secure vendor or service provider. Performing vendor security benchmark analyses at the RFP stage is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves comparing and ranking different vendors or service providers based on their security capabilities or performance. Extending security assessment to cover asset disposal on contract termination is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves verifying and validating that any assets or data belonging to the organization are securely disposed of by the vendor or service provider at the end of the contract. Extending security assessment to include random penetration testing is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves testing and auditing the vendor’s or service provider’s security controls or systems at random intervals during the contract. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-1/data-ownership-and-custodianship-in-the-cloud https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/integrating-assurance-functions

 The online bank should first isolate the affected network segment, as this is the most effective way to contain the attack and prevent it from spreading to other parts of the network or compromising more data or systems. Isolating the affected network segment also helps to preserve the evidence and facilitate the investigation and recovery process. Reporting the root cause to the board of directors, assessing whether personally identifiable information (Pll) is compromised, and shutting down the entire network are not the first actions that the online bank should take, as they may not be feasible or appropriate at the time of the attack, and may cause more disruption, confusion, or damage to the business operations and reputation. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1641; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 362; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 213

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation = The risk owner is the person or entity with the accountability and authority to manage a risk. The risk owner should have the decision-making authority and the ability to allocate resources for risk treatment and related control activities. The risk owner should also be responsible for monitoring and reporting on the risk, but these are not the most important considerations when assigning a risk owner. The risk owner may not have adequate knowledge of risk treatment and related control activities, but can delegate or consult with experts as needed. The risk owner should also have sufficient time for managing the risk effectively, but this is not a prerequisite for assigning a risk owner.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 76

CISM Practice Quiz, question 4171

The first step is to research legal and regulatory requirements for the new locations. Different countries have varying security and privacy laws, and understanding these is critical before adapting policies or procedures.

“Security requirements will vary depending on local legal and regulatory obligations, which must be understood as part of international expansion.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Compliance Requirements

The ISACA CISM practice database also highlights this step as the initial and critical move in international expansions.

 A detailed incident notification process is most important to include in an incident response plan to ensure incidents are responded to by the appropriate individuals. The incident notification process defines the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team members, the escalation procedures, the communication channels, the reporting requirements, and the stakeholders to be informed. The incident notification process helps to ensure that the right people are involved in the incident response, that the incident is handled in a timely and efficient manner, and that the relevant information is shared with the appropriate parties. Skills required for the incident response team, a list of external resources to assist with incidents, and service level agreements (SLAs) are also important elements of an incident response plan, but they are not as critical as the incident notification process. Skills required for the incident response team describe the competencies and qualifications of the team members, but they do not specify who should be notified or involved in the incident response. A list of external resources to assist with incidents provides a directory of external parties that can provide support or expertise in the incident response, but it does not define the criteria or process for engaging them. Service level agreements (SLAs) define the expectations and obligations of the service providers and the service recipients in the incident response, but they do not detail the steps or procedures for notifying or escalating incidents. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 191-1921; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 662

According to the CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition1, the information security manager is responsible for ensuring that the information security program supports the organization’s objectives and aligns with applicable laws and regulations. The information security manager is also responsible for overseeing the implementation and maintenance of effective IT controls, as well as monitoring and reporting on their performance.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition, ISACA, 2016, Chapter 1, page 10.

A security information and event management (SIEM) system is a type of detective control because it monitors and analyzes the security events or logs from different sources or systems, and detects any anomalies or incidents that may indicate a security breach or compromise. A preventive control is a type of control that prevents or blocks any unauthorized or malicious activity or access from occurring. A deterrent control is a type of control that discourages or warns any potential attackers or intruders from attempting any unauthorized or malicious activity or access. A corrective control is a type of control that restores or repairs any damage or disruption caused by an unauthorized or malicious activity or access. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-6/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

Analyzing security anomalies is the most effective way to detect security incidents, as it involves comparing the current state of the information system and network with the expected or normal state, and identifying any deviations or irregularities that may indicate a security breach or compromise. Security anomalies can be detected by using various tools and techniques, such as security information and event management (SIEM) systems, intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS), log analysis, network traffic analysis, and behavioral analysis. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

Involving functional managers in program development is the most essential element of an information security program, because they are responsible for ensuring that the information security policies, standards, and procedures are implemented and enforced within their respective business units. They also provide input and feedback on the information security requirements, risks, and controls that affect their operations and objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 37: “Functional managers are responsible for ensuring that the information security policies, standards, and procedures are implemented and enforced within their respective business units.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 38: “Functional managers should be involved in the development of the information security program to provide input and feedback on the information security requirements, risks, and controls that affect their operations and objectives.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Incident response policies must provide clear and actionable steps to ensure effective handling of incidents. Notification requirements are critical to ensure timely communication with stakeholders during an incident.

A. A description of testing methodology: While testing is important, it is typically addressed in incident response plans, not the policy itself.

B. Notification requirements: This is the BEST answer as it ensures that key stakeholders are informed promptly, allowing for coordination and mitigation efforts.

C. An infrastructure diagram: This is useful for understanding system architecture but is not a core policy requirement.

D. Recovery time objectives (RTOs): RTOs are part of business continuity and disaster recovery plans, not incident response policies.

The correct answer is A because an information security steering committee provides cross-functional governance oversight and helps ensure that information security objectives align with enterprise goals. Security framework objectives affect multiple business areas, including risk management, compliance, operations, technology, legal, and executive management. Therefore, approval should not rest solely with the information security manager, CISO, or CIO. The CISO and information security manager may develop and recommend objectives, while the CIO may provide technology leadership, but the steering committee is better positioned to review, prioritize, and approve objectives from an enterprise governance perspective. In CISM, effective information security governance requires senior-level direction, oversight, and alignment with business objectives. A steering committee also helps resolve conflicts, allocate resources, and ensure accountability across the organization. Because the framework establishes the direction and expectations for the security program, approval by the steering committee provides broader business representation and governance authority.

The most important item to verify during an incident response test is whether incident response team members know their responsibilities . CISM incident management emphasizes that effective response depends on clearly defined and understood roles, responsibilities, escalation paths, and decision authority. During a real incident, confusion about who must contain, investigate, communicate, approve, or recover systems can cause delays and increase business impact. Users knowing call-tree numbers is useful, but the response team’s execution responsibilities are more central to incident handling. Cross-training is valuable for resilience, but it is secondary to each team member understanding their assigned role. Senior management endorsement is important for governance and support, but it is not what an operational test primarily validates. Incident response testing should determine whether the process works in practice, including coordination, communication, containment, escalation, and recovery. Therefore, verifying that response team members understand their responsibilities is the most important objective of the test.

Risk ownership is the most important detail to capture in an organization ' s risk register. Risk ownership is the responsibility for managing a risk, including taking corrective action, and should be assigned to a specific individual or team. It is important to note that the risk owner is not necessarily the same as the risk acceptor, who is the individual or team who makes the final decision to accept a risk. Capturing risk ownership in the risk register is important to ensure that risks are actively managed and that the responsible parties are held accountable.

When a new cybersecurity regulation has been introduced, an information security manager should first consult corporate legal counsel to understand the scope, applicability, and implications of the regulation for the organization. Legal counsel can also advise on the compliance obligations and deadlines, as well as the potential penalties or sanctions for non-compliance. Based on this information, the information security manager can then perform a gap analysis to assess the current state of compliance and identify any areas that need improvement. The information security policy can then be updated accordingly to reflect the new regulatory requirements. References: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.wiley.com/en-us/CISM+Certified+Information+Security+Manager+Study+Guide-p-9781119801948

The BEST course of action when an online company discovers a network attack in progress is to isolate the affected network segment. This prevents the attacker from gaining further access to the network and limits the scope of the attack. Dumping event logs to removable media and enabling trace logging may be useful for forensic purposes, but should not be the first course of action in the midst of an active attack. Shutting off all network access points would be too drastic and would prevent legitimate traffic from accessing the network.

Before drafting or enforcing policies, the first step is to evaluate the risks posed by employee use of social media. This may include data leakage, reputational damage, phishing, and legal liability.

Once risks are identified and understood in the organization’s context, policies can be developed that specifically address those risks. Acting prematurely without a risk assessment can lead to overly restrictive or insufficient policies.

“Security policies should be risk-driven. Understanding potential threats and impacts is the foundation for effective policy creation.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Risk-Based Policy Development*

 A post-incident review (PIR) is the process of evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response after the incident has been resolved. A PIR aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the response process, the root causes and impacts of the incident, the lessons learned and best practices, and the recommendations and action plans for improvement1. A PIR can help an organization enhance its incident response capabilities, reduce the likelihood and severity of future incidents, and increase its resilience and maturity2.

A PIR is the best process to support the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because it provides a systematic and comprehensive way to assess the performance and outcomes of the response process, and to identify and implement the necessary changes and improvements. A PIR involves collecting and analyzing relevant data and feedback from various sources, such as incident logs, reports, evidence, metrics, surveys, interviews, and observations. A PIR also involves comparing the actual response with the expected or planned response, and measuring the achievement of the response objectives and the satisfaction of the stakeholders3. A PIR also involves documenting and communicating the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the evaluation, and ensuring that they are followed up and implemented.

The other options are not as good as a PIR in supporting the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on a PIR. A root cause analysis (RCA) is a technique to identify the underlying factors or reasons that caused the incident, and to prevent or mitigate their recurrence. An RCA can help an organization understand the nature and origin of the incident, and to address the problem at its source, rather than its symptoms. However, an RCA is not sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, because it does not cover other aspects, such as the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, and best practices. An RCA is usually a part of a PIR, rather than a separate process. A chain of custody (CoC) is a process of maintaining and documenting the integrity and security of the evidence collected during the incident response. A CoC can help an organization ensure that the evidence is reliable, authentic, and admissible in legal or regulatory proceedings. However, a CoC is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather a requirement or a standard to follow during the response process. A CoC does not provide any feedback or analysis on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. An incident logging is a process of recording and tracking the details and activities of the incident response. An incident logging can help an organization monitor and manage the response process, and to provide an audit trail and a source of information for the evaluation. However, an incident logging is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather an input or a tool for the evaluation. An incident logging does not provide any assessment or measurement on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 2: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response 3: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3

Information security program metrics are the best way to demonstrate the status of an organization’s information security program to the board of directors, as they provide relevant and meaningful information on the performance, effectiveness, and value of the program, as well as the current and emerging risks and the corresponding mitigation strategies. Information security program metrics should be aligned with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization, and should be presented in a clear and concise manner that enables the board of directors to make informed decisions and provide oversight. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

 This is the most urgent and effective action to prevent further damage or compromise of the organization’s network and data. The other options are less important or irrelevant in this situation.

According to How to identify suspicious insider activity using Active Directory, one of the steps to detect and respond to suspicious activity is to isolate the affected device from the network. This can be done by disabling the network adapter, unplugging the network cable, or blocking the device’s IP address on the firewall1. This will prevent the device from communicating with any malicious actors or spreading malware to other devices on the network.

`

Validating the authenticity of the patch is the first step in patch management procedures when receiving an emergency security patch, as it helps to ensure that the patch is genuine and not malicious. Validating the authenticity of the patch can be done by verifying the source, signature, checksum, or certificate of the patch, and comparing it with the information provided by the software vendor or manufacturer. Installing an unverified patch may introduce malware, compromise the system, or cause unexpected errors or conflicts.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3131; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.42; Practical Patch Management and Mitigation1; Vulnerability and patch management in the CISSP exam3

Recovery should not begin until the eradication phase is complete, meaning all malicious activity, malware, or unauthorized access has been removed. Starting recovery too early may reintroduce threats or result in re-infection.

“Recovery begins after eradication is complete, ensuring a clean environment for restoring services.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Response Lifecycle, Section: Recovery Phase*

The strongest justification for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. A security policy is a document that defines the goals, objec-tives, principles, roles, responsibilities, and requirements for protecting information and systems in an organization. A security policy should be based on a risk assessment that identifies and evaluates the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the organiza-tion’s assets, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of incidents. A security pol-icy should also be aligned with the organization’s business objectives and risk appe-tite1. However, there may be situations where a security policy cannot be fully enforced or complied with due to technical, operational, or business reasons. In such cases, an exception to the policy may be requested and granted by an authorized person or body, such as a security manager or a policy committee. An exception to a security policy should be justified by a clear and compelling reason that outweighs the risk of non-compliance. An exception to a security policy should also be documented, approved, monitored, reviewed, and revoked as necessary2. The strongest justification for grant-ing an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops is that the benefit is greater than the potential risk. USB storage devices are portable devices that can store large amounts of data and can be easily connected to laptops and desktops via USB ports. They can provide several benefits for users and organizations, such as:

•Enhancing data mobility and accessibility

•Improving data backup and recovery

•Supporting data sharing and collaboration

•Enabling data encryption and authentication

However, USB storage devices also pose significant security risks for users and organi-zations, such as:

•Introducing malware or viruses to laptops and desktops

•Exposing sensitive data to unauthorized access or disclosure

•Losing or stealing data due to device loss or theft

•Violating security policies or regulations

Therefore, an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage de-vices on laptops and desktops should only be granted if the benefit of using them is greater than the potential risk of compromising them. For example, if a user needs to transfer a large amount of data from one laptop to another in a remote location where there is no network connection available, and the data is encrypted and protected by a strong password on the USB device, then the benefit of using the USB device may be greater than the risk of losing or exposing it. The other options are not the strongest justifications for granting an exception to the security policy that disables access to USB storage devices on laptops and desktops. Enabling USB storage devices based on user roles is not a justification, but rather a possible way of implementing a more gran-ular or flexible security policy that allows different levels of access for different types of users3. Users accepting the risk of noncompliance is not a justification, but rather a requirement for requesting an exception to a security policy that acknowledges their responsibility and accountability for any consequences of noncompliance4. Accessing being restricted to read-only is not a justification, but rather a possible control that can reduce the risk of introducing malware or viruses from USB devices to laptops and desktops5. References: 1: Information Security Policy - NIST 2: Policy Exception Man-agement - ISACA 3: Deploy and manage Removable Storage Access Control using In-tune - Microsoft Learn 4: Policy Exception Request Form - University of California 5: Re-movable Media Policy Writing Tips - CurrentWare

The most effective way to determine the alignment of an information security program with the business strategy is D. Engage business process owners. This is because business process owners are the key stakeholders who are responsible for defining, executing, and monitoring the business processes that support the organization’s mission, vision, and goals. By engaging them, the information security manager can understand their needs, expectations, and challenges, and ensure that the information security program is aligned with their requirements and objectives. Engaging business process owners can also help to establish trust, collaboration, and communication between the information security function and the business units, and foster a culture of security awareness and accountability.

Business process owners are the key stakeholders who are responsible for defining, executing, and monitoring the business processes that support the organization’s mission, vision, and goals. By engaging them, the information security manager can understand their needs, expectations, and challenges, and ensure that the information security program is aligned with their requirements and objectives. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.2, page 201; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 78, page 20

Requiring regular reporting from the IT service provider is the best way to ensure compliance with the organization’s information security requirements, as it allows the organization to monitor the performance, security incidents, service levels, and compliance status of the IT service provider. Reporting also helps to identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

The best way to achieve compliance with new global regulations related to the protection of personal information is to determine the current and desired state of controls, as this helps the information security manager to identify the gaps and requirements for compliance, and to prioritize and implement the necessary actions and measures to meet the regulatory standards. The current state of controls refers to the existing level of protection and compliance of the personal information, while the desired state of controls refers to the target level of protection and compliance that is required by the new regulations. By comparing the current and desired state of controls, the information security manager can assess the maturity and effectiveness of the information security program, and plan and execute a risk treatment plan to address the risks and issues related to the protection of personal information. Executing a risk treatment plan, reviewing contracts and statements of work (SOWs) with vendors, and implementing data regionalization controls are also important, but not as important as determining the current and desired state of controls, as they are dependent on the outcome of the gap analysis and the risk assessment, and may not be sufficient or appropriate to achieve compliance with the new regulations. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 491; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 352; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 203

 Replacing key controls with weaker compensating controls may introduce new vulnerabilities or increase the likelihood or impact of existing threats, thus raising the risk levels beyond the acceptable limits defined by the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization. This may expose the organization to unacceptable losses or damages, such as financial, reputational, legal, or operational. Therefore, the information security manager should be most concerned about the potential elevation of risk levels and ensure that the risk owner is aware of the consequences and accountable for the decision.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment, page 941.

The first consideration when evaluating cloud storage solutions is alignment with the organization’s data classification policy (B). CISM emphasizes that security requirements must be driven by data sensitivity and business value. Before assessing encryption methods, SLAs, or data transfer mechanisms, the organization must determine what type of data will be stored and what protection level is required. Data classification informs confidentiality, integrity, availability, privacy, and regulatory requirements. Evaluating SLAs (A) or transfer methods (C) without understanding data sensitivity risks misalignment with governance and compliance obligations. Data volume (D) is an operational consideration, not a security driver.

= The information security manager’s first course of action in this situation should be to conduct a risk assessment, which is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that arise from the violation of the policy prohibiting the use of cameras at the office. The risk assessment can help to determine the likelihood and impact of the unauthorized or inappropriate use of the cameras on the smartphones and tablet computers, such as capturing, transmitting, or disclosing sensitive or confidential information, compromising the privacy or security of the employees, customers, or partners, or violating the legal or regulatory requirements. The risk assessment can also help to identify and prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options, such as implementing technical, administrative, or physical controls to disable, restrict, or monitor the camera usage, enforcing the policy compliance and awareness, or revising the policy to reflect the current business needs and environment. The risk assessment can also help to communicate and report the risk level and status to the senior management and the relevant stakeholders, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the policy and the risk management process.

Revising the policy, performing a root cause analysis, and communicating the acceptable use policy are all possible courses of action that the information security manager can take after conducting the risk assessment, but they are not the first ones. Revising the policy is a process of updating and modifying the policy to align with the business objectives and strategy, to address the changes and challenges in the business and threat environment, and to incorporate the feedback and suggestions from the risk assessment and the stakeholders. Performing a root cause analysis is a process of investigating and identifying the underlying causes and factors that led to the violation of the policy, such as the lack of awareness, training, or enforcement, the inconsistency or ambiguity of the policy, or the conflict or gap between the policy and the business requirements or expectations. Communicating the acceptable use policy is a process of informing and educating the employees and the other users of the smartphones and tablet computers about the purpose, scope, and content of the policy, the roles and responsibilities of the users, the benefits and consequences of complying or violating the policy, and the methods and channels of reporting or resolving any policy issues or incidents. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 51-531; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1482

 The best way to test for the existence of backdoors in a mission-critical business application that was outsourced to a third-party developer is to perform security code reviews on the entire application. A backdoor is a hidden or undocumented feature or function in a software application that allows unauthorized or remote access, control, or manipulation of the application or the system it runs on. Backdoors can be intentionally or unintentionally introduced by the developers, or maliciously inserted by the attackers, and they can pose serious security risks and threats to the organization and its data. Security code reviews are the process of examining and analyzing the source code of a software application to identify and eliminate any security vulnerabilities, flaws, or weaknesses, such as backdoors, that may compromise the functionality, performance, or integrity of the application or the system. Security code reviews can be performed manually by the security experts, or automatically by the security tools, or both, and they can be done at different stages of the software development life cycle, such as design, coding, testing, or deployment. Security code reviews can help to detect and remove any backdoors in the application before they can be exploited by the attackers, and they can also help to improve the quality, reliability, and security of the application.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 87, page 812; CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, page 63.

A hot site is the most reliable type of recovery site and can support stringent recovery requirements because it is a fully operational facility that mirrors the primary production center. A hot site has all the hardware, software, data, network, and personnel ready to resume the critical business functions within minutes of a disruptive event. A hot site also has backup power, security, and communication systems to ensure the continuity of operations.

When dealing with a provider in another country, the most important consideration is the ability to enforce contractual obligations (D). CISM highlights jurisdictional risk, including differences in laws, regulations, and legal enforcement mechanisms. Logical separation (A), SLAs (B), and resiliency (C) are important but depend on enforceable contracts to be meaningful. Without enforceability, the organization may lack effective recourse in the event of security failures or breaches.

A formalized risk management framework (A) best ensures that risk appetite and risk tolerance are consistently applied during risk treatment decisions (mitigate, transfer, avoid, accept). In CISM risk management, risk appetite must be translated into decision criteria, escalation thresholds, approval authorities, and consistent evaluation methods—all of which are defined and enforced through a framework. Training and awareness (B) support culture, but they do not guarantee that treatment choices align with appetite in a repeatable, auditable way. Quantitative measurement (C) can improve precision, but even strong numbers can be misused without governance rules that tie outcomes to appetite thresholds and approval requirements. Automated KRI monitoring (D) helps track risk conditions, but it primarily supports ongoing monitoring, not the structured decision-making needed in treatment selection. A risk framework is the mechanism that institutionalizes appetite into processes, roles, reporting, and acceptance criteria.

The design phase of a BIA must begin with identifying critical business functions, since they determine:

Which systems/processes need protection

Recovery priorities

Acceptable downtime (RTO/MTD)

Without clearly defining what ' s critical, the BIA cannot guide resource allocation or continuity strategies effectively.

“A successful BIA must begin with identifying which business functions are critical to achieving organizational objectives.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery, Section: BIA Methodology*

 Management support is the primary consideration when developing an incident response plan, as it is essential for obtaining the necessary resources, authority, and commitment for the plan. Management support also helps to ensure that the plan is aligned with the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security strategy, and that it is communicated and enforced across the organization. Management support also facilitates the coordination and collaboration among different stakeholders, such as business units, IT functions, legal, public relations, and external parties, during an incident response.

The definition of an incident (A) is an important component of the incident response plan, as it provides the criteria and thresholds for identifying, classifying, and reporting security incidents. However, the definition of an incident is not the primary consideration, as it is derived from the organization’s security policies, standards, and procedures, and may vary depending on the context and impact of the incident.

Compliance with regulations (B) is also an important factor for the incident response plan, as it helps to ensure that the organization meets its legal and contractual obligations, such as notifying the authorities, customers, or partners of a security breach, preserving the evidence, and reporting the incident outcomes. However, compliance with regulations is not the primary consideration, as it is influenced by the nature and scope of the incident, and the applicable laws and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Previously reported incidents (D) are a valuable source of information and lessons learned for the incident response plan, as they help to identify the common types, causes, and impacts of security incidents, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the current incident response processes and capabilities. However, previously reported incidents are not the primary consideration, as they are not predictive or comprehensive of the future incidents, and may not reflect the changing threat landscape and business environment.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 4: Information Security Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan, page 181-1821

Learn more:

The document that should be triggered first when unknown malware has infected an organization’s critical system is the incident response plan because it defines the roles and responsibilities, procedures and protocols, tools and techniques for responding to and managing a security incident effectively and efficiently. Disaster recovery plan (DRP) is not a good document for this purpose because it focuses on restoring the organization’s critical systems and operations after a major disruption or disaster, which may not be necessary or appropriate at this stage. Business continuity plan (BCP) is not a good document for this purpose because it focuses on restoring the organization’s critical business functions and operations after a major disruption or disaster, which may not be necessary or appropriate at this stage. Vulnerability management plan is not a good document for this purpose because it focuses on identifying and evaluating the security weaknesses or exposures of the organization’s systems and assets, which may not be relevant or helpful at this stage. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

The correct answer is B because bypassing the standard onboarding and due diligence process creates a major third-party risk, especially where contracts were executed offline and access was granted without proper review. The primary concern is that the organization may lack sufficient contractual security, privacy, compliance, audit, service, incident notification, confidentiality, and termination requirements to govern the contractor relationship. Fourth-party outsourcing is possible, but it is only one risk that should normally be controlled through contract terms and due diligence. Further project delay is a business concern, but it should not override security and risk management requirements. Industry benchmarks may be useful, but they are not the main issue. CISM risk management principles require that third-party relationships be governed through due diligence, risk assessment, clearly defined responsibilities, access controls, and enforceable contractual obligations. Granting organizational access without proper contractual and risk controls can expose sensitive information, systems, and business processes to unacceptable risk.

= After a breach where the risk has been isolated and forensic processes have been performed, the next step should be to rebuild the server from the last verified backup. This will ensure that the server is restored to a known and secure state, and that any malicious code or data that may have been injected or compromised by the attacker is removed. Rebuilding the server from the original media may not be sufficient, as it may not include the latest patches or configurations that were applied before the breach. Placing the web server in quarantine or shutting it down may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the business operations or services that depend on the server. Rebuilding the server from the last verified backup is the best option to resume normal operations while maintaining security. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 118: “Recovery is the process of restoring normal operations after an incident. Recovery activities may include rebuilding systems, restoring data, applying patches, changing passwords, and testing functionality.”

Data Breach Experts Share The Most Important Next Step You Should Take After A Data Breach in 2014 & 2015, snippet: “Restore from backup. If you have a backup of your system from before the breach, wipe your system clean and restore from backup. This will ensure that any backdoors or malware installed by the hackers are removed.”

Standards (A) best convey minimum information security requirements in alignment with organizational policies. In CISM governance, policies define management’s intent and direction at a high level, while standards translate that intent into mandatory, enforceable minimum requirements that must be met across the organization. Standards ensure consistency and provide a clear benchmark against which compliance can be measured.

Procedures (B) describe how to perform specific tasks and are operational in nature; they are derived from standards and policies, not used to define minimum requirements. Regulations (C) are external mandates imposed by laws or regulatory bodies and are not internally defined mechanisms for conveying organizational security requirements. Baselines (D) typically represent a starting configuration or reference point for systems, often derived from standards, but they do not formally communicate organizational requirements on their own.

CISM clearly defines the hierarchy as policy → standards → procedures/guidelines, where standards play the critical role of establishing the minimum acceptable level of security needed to support governance objectives and ensure policy enforcement throughout the enterprise.

The correct answer is C because active involvement in an information security steering committee demonstrates senior management’s ongoing participation in governance, prioritization, decision-making, and oversight. Senior management support is not shown only by words or occasional communication; it is demonstrated through active engagement, resource allocation, risk decisions, and accountability. Top-down communication is useful and may show support, but it is less meaningful than direct participation in a governance body. Regular security awareness training is important for employees, but it does not necessarily prove senior management support. Participation in a certification program may improve professional skills or demonstrate individual commitment, but it is not the best indicator of organizational leadership support. In CISM, information security governance requires senior management direction and oversight to ensure that security objectives align with business objectives. A steering committee provides a formal mechanism for that oversight and involvement. Therefore, steering committee involvement is the best indicator of senior management support.

A security baseline is a set of minimum security requirements for a system or asset type. The CISM Review Manual states that a baseline should be uniform for all assets of the same type to ensure consistency, enforceability, and ease of monitoring. This standardization supports effective compliance and security operations. While other factors can influence baseline adjustments, uniformity for similar asset types is most critical.

The most important consideration during the requirements gathering phase of AI development in a healthcare organization is data privacy concerns (B). From a CISM governance and risk management perspective, healthcare organizations handle highly sensitive personal and regulated data, such as protected health information (PHI), which is subject to strict privacy, confidentiality, and regulatory requirements. During requirements gathering, it is critical to ensure that legal, regulatory, and ethical obligations related to data use, retention, consent, access controls, and cross-border processing are fully understood and incorporated into system requirements.

Algorithm selection (A), computational resources (C), and data labeling efficiencies (D) are important technical and operational considerations, but they are secondary and should be addressed only after privacy requirements are clearly defined. CISM emphasizes that security and privacy must be built in by design, not retrofitted later in development. Failure to address privacy requirements early can result in regulatory noncompliance, reputational damage, and unacceptable risk exposure.

In healthcare, governance-driven requirements—especially privacy, data minimization, and lawful processing—must guide AI system design to ensure alignment with organizational risk appetite and compliance obligations.

Ensuring encryption for data in transit is the best activity that supports the concept of confidentiality within the CIA triad, as it protects the data from unauthorized access or interception while it is being transmitted over a network. Encryption is a technique that transforms data into an unreadable form using a secret key, so that only authorized parties who have the key can decrypt and access the data. Encryption standards include AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and DES (Data Encryption Standard).

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 321; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Knowledge Statement 1.12; The CIA triad: Definition, components and examples3; CIA Triad - GeeksforGeeks4

Local regulations are the main concern for the information security manager when implementing a corporate security policy for managing PII, as different countries or regions may have different legal, regulatory or contractual requirements for the protection, processing, storage and transfer of PII. The information security manager should ensure that the policy complies with the applicable local regulations and respects the rights and preferences of the data subjects. The policy should also address the risks and challenges of cross-border data transfers and the use of cloud services.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 2191; CISM Online Review Course, Module 4, Lesson 2, Topic 12; Comparitech, PII Compliance: What is it and How to Implement it3

The PRIMARY benefit to an organization when information security program requirements are aligned with employment and staffing processes is that access is granted based on task requirements. This means that the organization can ensure that the employees have the appropriate level and scope of access to the information assets and systems that they need to perform their duties, and that the access is granted, reviewed, and revoked in accordance with the security policies and standards. This can help to reduce the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, or leakage of information, as well as to comply with the principle of least privilege and the segregation of duties12. Security incident reporting procedures are followed (A) is a benefit to an organization when information security program requirements are aligned with employment and staffing processes, but it is not the PRIMARY benefit. Security incident reporting procedures are the steps and guidelines that the employees should follow when they detect, report, or respond to a security incident. Aligning the information security program requirements with the employment and staffing processes can help to ensure that the employees are aware of and trained on the security incident reporting procedures, and that they are enforced and monitored by the management. This can help to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process, as well as to comply with the legal and contractual obligations12. Security staff turnover is reduced (B) is a benefit to an organization when information security program requirements are aligned with employment and staffing processes, but it is not the PRIMARY benefit. Security staff turnover is the rate at which the security personnel leave or join the organization. Aligning the information security program requirements with the employment and staffing processes can help to reduce the security staff turnover by ensuring that the security roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated, that the security personnel are adequately compensated and motivated, and that the security personnel are evaluated and developed regularly. This can help to retain the security talent and expertise, as well as to reduce the costs and risks associated with the security staff turnover12. Information assets are classified appropriately © is a benefit to an organization when information security program requirements are aligned with employment and staffing processes, but it is not the PRIMARY benefit. Information asset classification is the process of assigning a security level or category to the information assets based on their value, sensitivity, and criticality to the organization. Aligning the information security program requirements with the employment and staffing processes can help to ensure that the information assets are classified appropriately by establishing the ownership and custody of the information assets, the criteria and methods for the information asset classification, and the roles and responsibilities for the information asset classification. This can help to protect the information assets according to their security level or category, as well as to comply with the regulatory and contractual requirements12. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 75-76, 81-82, 88-89, 93-941; 2: CISM Domain 1: Information Security Governance (ISG) [2022 update]2

Communicating and enforcing policies demonstrates leadership commitment and drives behavior across the organization, fostering a culture of security.

“Policies must be effectively communicated and enforced to influence culture and employee behavior.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Security Culture*

Risk assessment is the BEST input to a business case for a technical solution to address potential system vulnerabilities, because it helps to identify and prioritize the most critical risks that the solution should mitigate or reduce. Risk assessment also helps to evaluate the costs and benefits of the solution in terms of reducing the likelihood and impact of potential threats and incidents.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 47: “Risk assessment is the process of identifying and analyzing information security risks and determining their potential impact on the enterprise’s business objectives.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 48: “Risk assessment provides input to the business case for information security investments by identifying and prioritizing the most critical risks that need to be addressed and evaluating the costs and benefits of the proposed solutions.”

Management decisions concerning information security investments will be most effective when they are based on the reporting of consistent and periodic assessments of risks. This will help management to understand the current and emerging threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts that affect the organization’s information assets and business processes. It will also help management to prioritize the allocation of resources and funding for the most critical and cost-effective security controls and solutions. The reporting of consistent and periodic assessments of risks will also enable management to monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security program, and to adjust the security strategy and objectives as needed. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 28.

Regulatory compliance is the most important objective when implementing a security policy for an organization handling personally identifiable information (PII) because it helps to ensure that the organization meets the legal and ethical obligations to protect the privacy and security of PII. PII is any information that can be used to identify, contact, or locate an individual, such as name, address, email, phone number, social security number, etc. PII is subject to various laws and regulations in different jurisdictions, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States, or the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada. Failing to comply with these regulations can result in fines, lawsuits, reputational damage, or loss of trust. Therefore, regulatory compliance is the correct answer.

= Standardization of compliance requirements is the best approach to reduce unnecessary duplication of compliance activities, as it allows for a common understanding of the objectives and expectations of various stakeholders, such as regulators, auditors, customers, and business partners. Standardization also facilitates the alignment of compliance activities with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance, and enables the identification and elimination of redundant or conflicting controls. References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, page 721; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, question 952

Learn more:

The supportive tone at the top regarding security is the greatest impact on efforts to improve an organization’s security posture. This means that senior management should demonstrate their commitment and leadership to information security by setting clear goals, allocating adequate resources, communicating effectively, and rewarding good practices. A supportive tone at the top can also influence the culture and behavior of the organization, as well as foster trust and collaboration among stakeholders12. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1261; CISM Item Development Guide, page 82

The first step when performing triage of a malware incident is to contain the affected system, which means isolating it from the network and preventing any further communication or data transfer with the attacker or other compromised systems. Containing the affected system helps to limit the scope and impact of the incident, preserve the evidence, and prevent the spread of the malware to other systems.

References = NIST SP 800-61 Revision 2, CISM Review Manual 15th Edition

Security metrics are the best way to determine the maturity of an information security program because they are quantifiable indicators of the performance and effectiveness of the security controls and processes. Security metrics help to evaluate the current state of security, identify gaps and weaknesses, measure progress and improvement, and communicate the value and impact of security to stakeholders. Therefore, security metrics are the correct answer.

Network segmentation is the most effective control to prevent lateral movement. In ransomware attacks, attackers often breach one endpoint and move laterally across the network to reach critical assets.

Segmentation limits this movement by isolating systems into different zones or subnets, thereby reducing the attack surface and preventing unauthorized internal traversal.

DLP and encryption are primarily focused on data protection, not internal network movement.

IDS can detect intrusions but does not prevent movement like segmentation does.

“Network segmentation limits the scope of access for compromised systems and is a key strategy in preventing lateral movement in an attack.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Architecture, Section: Network Security*

Real-world example: “In the NotPetya and WannaCry incidents, poor internal segmentation allowed malware to propagate rapidly.”

The primary purpose of a tabletop exercise is to prepare the incident response team for a real-world event (C). Tabletop exercises allow participants to walk through scenarios, clarify roles and responsibilities, validate decision-making, and identify gaps in procedures—without the disruption of a live incident. While outcomes may inform resource needs (A), program maturity (B), or leadership reporting (D), these are secondary benefits. CISM emphasizes regular testing of incident response capabilities to ensure teams can respond quickly, consistently, and effectively under pressure.

The most effective control to prevent the proliferation of shadow IT is implementing a software allow list. From a CISM governance perspective, shadow IT represents the use of unauthorized applications and technologies outside established governance and approval processes, which increases risk exposure and undermines control effectiveness. CISM emphasizes that preventive controls are superior to detective controls when the objective is to stop undesirable behavior before it occurs.

A software allow list enforces policy by ensuring that only approved and authorized applications can be installed or executed, directly preventing users from introducing unapproved tools. In contrast, detecting unlicensed software (A) and conducting software audits (B) are detective controls that identify shadow IT only after it has already been deployed. Periodic vulnerability scanning (D) focuses on identifying technical weaknesses, not unauthorized software usage, and therefore does not address the root cause of shadow IT.

CISM guidance stresses aligning technical controls with governance policies to ensure consistent enforcement and risk reduction. Allow listing operationalizes policy requirements and supports management’s intent by embedding control directly into system operation.

The correct answer is D because application allow listing is one of the most effective preventive controls against ransomware execution. Allow listing permits only approved and authorized applications, scripts, or executables to run, thereby reducing the likelihood that malicious ransomware code can execute on endpoints or servers. An application deny list blocks known malicious applications, but it is less effective because attackers can modify filenames, hashes, or code to bypass known deny rules. A web security gateway can help reduce exposure to malicious downloads, phishing links, and compromised websites, but it does not fully prevent ransomware introduced through other channels. A host intrusion detection system may detect suspicious activity, but detection is reactive and may occur after ransomware has already started execution or encryption. CISM risk management principles favor preventive controls where feasible, especially for high-impact threats. Since ransomware success often depends on unauthorized code execution, application allow listing provides stronger protection than the other options.

Assessing potential information security risk to the organization is the first step that the information security manager should take when considering the feasibility of implementing a big data solution to analyze customer data, as it helps to identify and evaluate the threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts that may arise from the collection, processing, storage, and sharing of large volumes and varieties of customer data. Assessing risk also helps to determine the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization, and to prioritize the risk treatment options and security controls that are needed to protect the customer data and the big data solution. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

 The information security manager’s best course of action is to present the risk to senior management, because this is a case of conflicting objectives and priorities between the information security team and the business management. The information security manager should explain the potential impact and likelihood of a security breach due to the violation of the access policy, as well as the possible legal, regulatory, and reputational consequences. The information security manager should also provide alternative solutions that can achieve both operational efficiency and security compliance, such as implementing single sign-on, role-based access control, or multi-factor authentication. The information security manager should not enforce the policy without senior management’s approval, because this could cause operational disruption and business dissatisfaction. The information security manager should not modify the policy without a proper risk assessment and approval process, because this could weaken the security posture and expose the organization to more threats. The information security manager should not create an exception for the deviation without a formal risk acceptance and documentation process, because this could create inconsistency and ambiguity in the policy enforcement and accountability. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, pages 127-128, 138-139, 143-144.

Organizational culture (C) is the most important factor when developing a security awareness strategy because culture determines how messages are received, accepted, and acted upon. CISM emphasizes that awareness programs must be tailored to the organization’s values, behaviors, leadership tone, and risk mindset. Even well-funded programs or advanced delivery platforms will fail if they do not align with how employees think and work. Organizational maturity (A) and cost (B) influence scope and pacing, while technical delivery methods (D) are implementation details. A culture-aware approach ensures that security awareness drives behavioral change, which is the ultimate goal of awareness initiatives.

According to the CISM Manual, updating procedures for managing security devices should be based on changes in risk technology and process, not on the organization’s security framework, notification to management of the procedural changes, or review and approval of procedures by management1. These are not the most important considerations when updating procedures for managing security devices, as they do not reflect the actual impact of the changes on the security posture of the organization.

The CISM Manual states that “procedures for managing security devices should be updated whenever there are significant changes in the risk technology or process that affect the security devices” (IR 8287A)1. For example, if a new security device is introduced or an existing one is replaced, its procedures should be updated accordingly. Similarly, if a new risk technology or process is implemented that affects how security devices are configured, monitored, or maintained, its procedures should be updated as well1.

The CISM Manual also provides guidance on how to update procedures for managing security devices in a systematic and consistent manner. It recommends using a change management process that involves identifying, analyzing, approving, implementing, and evaluating changes to security device procedures1. It also suggests using a change control board (CCB) that consists of representatives from different stakeholders who review and approve changes to security device procedures before they are implemented1.

The business impact analysis (BIA) is the foundational step in disaster recovery planning. The CISM Review Manual states that BIA should be performed first to determine critical business functions, recovery priorities, and the impact of disruptions. Risk assessments and documentation follow after the BIA.

Integrating information security into existing change management processes ensures that security considerations are included in all application changes and deployments. This addresses the root cause of bypassed security reviews and provides a consistent, repeatable process to manage risk going forward.

“Integrating security into change management ensures that changes to systems and applications undergo appropriate security review and testing prior to implementation, thereby addressing vulnerabilities proactively.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Change Management*

 An organization-wide social media policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for using social media platforms within the organization. It covers topics such as who can use social media, what they can post, how they should protect confidential information, and what are the consequences for violating the policy. An organization-wide social media policy helps to mitigate the risk of confidential information being disclosed by employees on social media by providing a clear and consistent framework for managing social media activities12.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 271 2: CISM Review Manual (Print Version), page 271

Residual risk is the risk that remains after applying controls to mitigate the original risk. It is important to assess the residual risk after remediation to ensure that it is within the acceptable level and tolerance of the organization. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

Security policy provisions are the statements or rules that define the information security objectives, principles, roles and responsibilities, and requirements for the organization. Security policy provisions must be established to maintain an effective information security governance framework, as they provide the foundation and direction for the information security activities and processes within the organization. Security policy provisions also help to align the information security governance framework with the business strategy and objectives, and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations. The other options, such as security controls automation, defined security metrics, or change management processes, are important components of an information security governance framework, but they are not essential to establish it. References:

https://www.iso.org/standard/74046.html

https://www.nistf.gov/cyberframework

https://www.iso.org/standard/27001

 The role of the information security manager in finalizing contract negotiations with service providers is to ensure that the outsourcing process is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and objectives. One of the key aspects of this process is to perform a risk analysis on the outsourcing process, which involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from outsourcing activities. A risk analysis can help the information security manager to determine the appropriate level of security controls and requirements for the outsourced process, as well as to monitor and evaluate its performance and compliance. A risk analysis can also help to avoid or minimize legal, financial, reputational, or operational risks associated with outsourcing1. References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

= The PRIMARY objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident, which is the underlying factor or condition that enabled the incident to occur. Identifying the root cause helps to prevent or mitigate future incidents, as well as to improve the incident response process. Re-evaluating the impact of incidents, identifying vulnerabilities, and identifying control improvements are secondary objectives of a post-incident review, which are derived from the root cause analysis. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3061; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1512

The primary objective of performing a post-incident review is to identify the root cause of the incident. After an incident has occurred, the post-incident review process involves gathering and analyzing evidence to determine the cause of the incident. This analysis will help to identify both the underlying vulnerability that allowed the incident to occur, as well as any control improvements that should be implemented to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Additionally, the post-incident review process can also be used to re-evaluate the impact of the incident, as well as any potential implications for the organization.

The correct answer is D because the recovery phase focuses on restoring affected IT services, systems, and operations after containment and eradication have been completed. The objective is to return services to an operational state in a controlled manner while ensuring that the threat has been removed and systems are stable. Recovering business operation support is related to the broader business continuity goal, but the recovery phase of incident management is primarily concerned with restoring IT services and affected environments. Performing a lessons-learned review usually occurs after recovery, during post-incident review or improvement activities. Documenting restoration actions is important for evidence, accountability, and future analysis, but documentation is not the primary objective of recovery. In CISM incident management, recovery includes restoring systems, validating functionality, monitoring for recurrence, and returning operations to normal. Therefore, the primary objective of the recovery phase is to bring IT services back online safely and effectively.

 The primary purpose of business continuity and disaster recovery plans is to ensure that the organization can resume its critical business functions within the stated recovery time objectives (RTOs) after a disruptive event. RTOs are based on the business needs and the impact analysis of each function or process. Therefore, meeting the business needs is the best indicator that the plans are effective. Regulatory requirements, internal compliance requirements, and risk management objectives are important factors that influence the development and testing of the plans, but they are not the ultimate measure of their effectiveness. References = CISM Certified Information Security Manager Study Guide, Chapter 9: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery, page 3071; CISM Foundations: Module 4 Course, Part Two: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans2; Imperva, Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Planning (BCP & DRP)3

After completing a business impact analysis, the next step is to identify resources for business recovery . The BIA identifies critical business processes, recovery priorities, impacts over time, recovery time objectives, and recovery point objectives. Once these requirements are known, the organization must determine the resources needed to meet them, such as personnel, facilities, technology, data, applications, vendors, and alternate processing capabilities. Developing a business continuity plan occurs after recovery requirements and resources are understood. Evaluating the disaster recovery plan would generally occur after plans have been developed and tested. Developing requirements for the incident response plan is related to incident management, but it is not the next step after a BIA in continuity planning. CISM program management emphasizes that BIA outputs drive recovery strategy development, and resource identification is a necessary bridge between impact analysis and actionable continuity plans. Therefore, identifying resources for business recovery is the appropriate next activity after the BIA.

The correct answer is A because a tabletop exercise is a low-cost and effective way to assess incident response capabilities. It allows participants to walk through a simulated incident scenario and evaluate roles, responsibilities, escalation paths, communication procedures, decision-making, and coordination without disrupting production systems. A tabletop exercise can identify weaknesses in the incident response plan, improve readiness, and increase participant familiarity with response procedures. Senior management interviews may provide insight into governance awareness, but they do not test operational response capability. Penetration testing can identify vulnerabilities and may trigger response processes, but it is more expensive and focused on technical exposure rather than full incident response capability. A third-party assessment can be valuable, but it is usually more costly than an internal tabletop exercise. CISM incident management emphasizes regular testing, lessons learned, and continuous improvement. Because tabletop exercises provide practical assessment value with relatively low cost and low operational risk, they are the most cost-effective method.

The Information Security Manager ' s primary responsibility is to ensure that the organization ' s information assets are adequately protected. In this scenario, there is a conflict between the approved mobile access policy and industry best practices. Developing security standards based on a flawed policy could lead to significant security vulnerabilities.

Why the other options are not the best course of action:

A. Align the standards with the organizational policy: This would perpetuate the misalignment with best practices, potentially leaving the organization exposed to risks.

B. Align the standards with industry best practices: While this is ideal from a security perspective, it directly contradicts the approved policy, which could create operational and compliance issues.

D. Perform a cost-benefit analysis of aligning the standards to policy: A cost-benefit analysis might be useful at some point, but it does not address the fundamental issue of a policy that is not in line with best practices.

Key CISM Principles Reflected:

Alignment with Organizational Objectives: Security standards and policies should support and enable the organization ' s business objectives.

Risk Management: Identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks are essential elements of information security management.

Governance: Effective governance ensures that information security activities are aligned with the organization ' s strategies and objectives.

In summary: The Information Security Manager should proactively engage senior management to highlight the discrepancy between the approved policy and industry best practices. The goal is to revise the policy to ensure it adequately addresses security risks while supporting the organization ' s objectives. Once the policy is aligned with best practices, the security standards can be developed accordingly.

 Effective incident response testing is a process of verifying and validating the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and resources that are designed to respond to and recover from information security incidents. The purpose of testing is to ensure that the incident response team and the organization are prepared, capable, and confident to handle any potential or actual incidents that could affect the business continuity, reputation, and value. The best way to facilitate effective testing is to simulate realistic test scenarios that reflect the most likely or critical threats and vulnerabilities that could cause an incident, and the most relevant or significant impacts and consequences that could result from an incident. Simulating realistic test scenarios can help to evaluate the adequacy, accuracy, and applicability of the incident response plan, procedures, roles, and resources, as well as to identify and address any gaps, weaknesses, or errors that could hinder or compromise the incident response process. Simulating realistic test scenarios can also help to enhance the skills, knowledge, and experience of the incident response team and the organization, as well as to improve the communication, coordination, and collaboration among the stakeholders involved in the incident response process. Simulating realistic test scenarios can also help to measure and report the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2401; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1362

The best way for an information security manager to improve the effectiveness of an organization’s information security program is to collaborate with business and IT functions in determining controls. Collaboration is a key factor for ensuring that the information security program is aligned with the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security strategy, and that it supports the business processes and activities. Collaboration also helps to gain the buy-in, involvement, and ownership of the business and IT functions, who are the primary stakeholders and users of the information security program. Collaboration also facilitates the communication, coordination, and integration of the information security program across the organization, and enables the information security manager to understand the needs, expectations, and challenges of the business and IT functions, and to propose the most appropriate and effective security controls and solutions.

Focusing on addressing conflicts between security and performance (A) is a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. Security and performance are often competing or conflicting goals, as security controls may introduce overhead, complexity, or delays that affect the efficiency, usability, or availability of the systems or processes. Addressing these conflicts may help to optimize the balance and trade-off between security and performance, and to enhance the user satisfaction and acceptance of the security controls. However, focusing on addressing conflicts between security and performance does not necessarily improve the alignment, integration, or communication of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the involvement or ownership of the stakeholders.

Including information security requirements in the change control process © is also a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. The change control process is a process that manages the initiation, approval, implementation, and review of changes to the systems or processes, such as enhancements, updates, or fixes. Including information security requirements in the change control process may help to ensure that the changes do not introduce new or increased security risks or impacts, and that they comply with the security policies, standards, and procedures. However, including information security requirements in the change control process does not necessarily improve the collaboration, communication, or coordination of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the buy-in or involvement of the stakeholders.

Obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls (D) is also a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. Automated security controls are security controls that are implemented by using software, hardware, or other technologies, such as encryption, firewalls, or antivirus, to perform security functions or tasks without human intervention. Obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls may help to improve the efficiency, consistency, or reliability of the security controls, and to reduce the human errors, negligence, or malicious actions. However, obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls does not necessarily improve the collaboration, communication, or integration of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the ownership or involvement of the stakeholders.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy Development, Subsection: Collaboration, page 24-251

Initiating incident response is the best course of action after a server has been attacked because it activates the incident response plan or process, which defines the roles and responsibilities, procedures and protocols, tools and techniques for responding to and managing a security incident effectively and efficiently. Reviewing vulnerability assessment is not a good course of action because it does not address the current attack or its impact, but rather evaluates the potential weaknesses or exposures of the server. Conducting a security audit is not a good course of action because it does not address the current attack or its impact, but rather verifies and validates the compliance or performance of the server’s security controls or systems. Isolating the system is not a good course of action because it does not address the current attack or its impact, but rather stops or limits any communication or interaction with the server. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons- learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

The business owner is the most appropriate person to own the risk associated with the failure of a privileged access control because they are ultimately responsible for the protection and use of the information in their business unit1. The data owner is responsible for determining the access rights for specific data sets, but not for the access control mechanisms2. The information security manager is responsible for implementing and enforcing the security policies and standards, but not for owning the risk3. The compliance manager is responsible for ensuring that the organization meets the regulatory requirements, but not for owning the risk3. References: 1 https://www.cyberark.com/resources/blog/how-do-you-prioritize-risk-for-privileged-access-management 3 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-1/capability-framework-for-privileged-access-management 2 https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/218049/what-is-the-difference-between-data-owner-data-custodian-and-system-owner

 A risk register is a document that records and tracks the information security risks facing an organization, such as their sources, impacts, likelihoods, responses, and statuses. A risk register provides the most comprehensive insight into ongoing threats facing an organization, as it covers both internal and external threats, as well as their current and potential effects on the organization’s assets, processes, and objectives. A risk register also helps to prioritize and monitor the risk mitigation actions and controls, and to communicate the risk information to relevant stakeholders. Therefore, option B is the most appropriate answer.

Option A is not the best answer because a business impact analysis (BIA) is a process that identifies and evaluates the critical business functions, assets, and dependencies of an organization, and assesses their potential impact in the event of a disruption or loss. A BIA does not provide a comprehensive insight into ongoing threats facing an organization, as it focuses more on the consequences of the threats, rather than their sources, likelihoods, or responses. A BIA is mainly used to support the business continuity and disaster recovery planning, rather than the information security risk management.

Option C is not the best answer because penetration testing is a method of simulating a malicious attack on an organization’s IT systems or networks, to evaluate their security posture and identify any vulnerabilities or weaknesses that could be exploited by real attackers. Penetration testing does not provide a comprehensive insight into ongoing threats facing an organization, as it only covers a specific scope, target, and scenario, rather than the whole range of threats, sources, and impacts. Penetration testing is mainly used to validate and improve the technical security controls, rather than the information security risk management.

Option D is not the best answer because vulnerability assessment is a process of scanning and analyzing an organization’s IT systems or networks, to detect and report any flaws or gaps that could pose a security risk. Vulnerability assessment does not provide a comprehensive insight into ongoing threats facing an organization, as it only covers the technical aspects of the threats, rather than their business, legal, or regulatory implications. Vulnerability assessment is mainly used to identify and remediate the security weaknesses, rather than the information security risk management. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition1, pages 258-259; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, QID 306.

A risk register provides the MOST comprehensive insight into ongoing threats facing an organization. This is because a risk register is a document that records and tracks the identified risks, their likelihood, impact, mitigation strategies, and status. A risk register helps an organization to monitor and manage the threats that could affect its objectives, assets, and operations. A risk register also helps an organization to prioritize its response efforts and allocate its resources accordingly.

 The number of business objectives directly supported by information security initiatives is the best indication of information security strategy alignment with the organizational goals and objectives. This metric shows how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy, and how effectively the information security program is delivering value to the organization. The more business objectives that are supported by information security initiatives, the more aligned the information security strategy is with the organizational goals and objectives.

The other options are not the best indicators of information security strategy alignment, as they do not directly measure the impact or contribution of information security initiatives to the business objectives. The percentage of information security incidents resolved within defined SLAs is a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the incident management process, but it does not reflect how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy. The percentage of corporate budget allocated to information security initiatives is a measure of the investment and commitment of the organization to information security, but it does not indicate how well the information security initiatives are aligned with the business objectives or how they are prioritized. The number of business executives who have attended information security awareness sessions is a measure of the awareness and involvement of the senior management in information security, but it does not show how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy or how it supports the business objectives. References =

CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA, Domain 1, Task 1.1

CISM MASTER CHEAT SHEET - SkillCertPro, Chapter 1, page 2

Certified Information Security Manager (CISM), page 1

Certified Information Security Manager Exam Prep Guide: Aligned with …, page 1

CISM: Certified Information Security SKILLS COVERED Manager, page 1

Conducting a business impact analysis (BIA) is the first step when creating an organization’s disaster recovery plan (DRP) because it helps to identify and prioritize the critical business functions or processes that need to be restored after a disruption, and determine their recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs)2. Identifying the response and recovery teams is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves assigning roles and responsibilities for executing the DRP. Reviewing the communications plan is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves defining the communication channels and protocols for notifying and updating the stakeholders during and after a disruption. Developing response and recovery strategies is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves selecting and implementing the appropriate solutions and procedures for restoring the critical business functions or processes. References: 2 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/business-impact-analysis-bia-and-disaster-recovery-planning-drp

The best step to address the situation of losing a smartphone that contains sensitive information is to remotely wipe the device, which means erasing all the data on the device and restoring it to factory settings. Remotely wiping the device can prevent unauthorized access to the sensitive information and protect the organization from data breaches or leaks. Remotely wiping the device can be done through services such as Find My Device for Android or Find My iPhone for iOS, or through mobile device management (MDM) solutions. The other options, such as disabling the user’s access, terminating the device connectivity, or escalating to the user’s management, may not be effective or timely enough to secure the sensitive information on the device. References:

https://www.security.org/resources/protect-data-lost-device/

https://support.google.com/android/answer/6160491?hl=en

https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/locate-lock-erase-how-to-find-lost-android-phone

The best security control for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones is establishing the authority to remote wipe. Remote wipe is a feature that allows an authorized administrator or user to remotely erase the data on a device in case of loss, theft, or compromise1. Remote wipe can help prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the organization’s information on employee-owned smartphones, as well as protect the privacy of the employee’s personal data. Remote wipe can be implemented through various methods, such as mobile device management (MDM) software, native device features, or third-party applications2. However, remote wipe requires the consent and cooperation of the employee, as well as a clear policy that defines the conditions and procedures for its use. The other options are not the best security controls for an organization that permits the storage and use of its critical and sensitive information on employee-owned smartphones. Developing security awareness training is an important measure to educate employees about the security risks and responsibilities associated with using their own smartphones for work purposes, but it does not provide a technical or physical protection for the data on the devices3. Requiring the backup of the organization’s data by the user is a good practice to ensure data availability and recovery in case of device failure or loss, but it does not prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of the data on the devices4. Monitoring how often the smartphone is used is a possible way to detect abnormal or suspicious activities on the devices, but it does not prevent or mitigate the impact of a data breach on the devices. References: 4: Mobile Device Backup - NIST 3: Security Awareness Training - NIST 1: Remote Wipe - Lifewire 2: How Businesses with a BYOD Policy Can Secure Employee Devices - IBM : Mobile Device Security Policy – SANS

Confidentiality is the security objective that best ensures that information is protected against unauthorized disclosure. Confidentiality means that only authorized parties can access or view sensitive or classified information. Integrity means that information is accurate and consistent and has not been tampered with or modified by unauthorized parties. Authenticity means that information is genuine and trustworthy and has not been forged or misrepresented by unauthorized parties. Nonrepudiation means that information can be verified and proven to be sent or received by a specific party without any possibility of denial. References: https://www.csoonline.com/article/3513899/the-cia-triad-definition-components-and-examples.html

The correct answer is C because an incident response team can limit impact most effectively when it understands the organization’s operational requirements, including critical systems, business priorities, dependencies, acceptable downtime, data sensitivity, and service restoration needs. Incident response decisions often require balancing containment with business continuity. For example, disconnecting a system may stop an attack but could also interrupt critical operations. Understanding operational requirements enables the team to choose response actions that reduce security impact while minimizing disruption to essential business activities. Senior management’s understanding of risk appetite is important for governance, but the response team needs practical operational knowledge during incidents. Training completion trends are useful for program monitoring, but they do not directly guide impact-limiting decisions during an event. Funding supports capability, but it is not the most immediate consideration during response. CISM incident management emphasizes business impact reduction, coordinated response, prioritization, and restoration of critical services. Therefore, understanding operational requirements is the most important consideration for limiting incident impact.

= The most important consideration when establishing an organization’s information security governance committee is to ensure that members represent functions across the organization. This is because the information security governance committee is responsible for setting the direction, scope, and objectives of the information security program, and for ensuring that the program aligns with the organization’s business goals and strategies. By having members from different functions, such as finance, human resources, operations, legal, and IT, the committee can ensure that the information security program considers the needs, expectations, and perspectives of various stakeholders, and that the program supports the organization’s mission, vision, and values. Having a diverse and representative committee also helps to foster a culture of security awareness and accountability throughout the organization, and to promote collaboration and communication among different functions.

Members having knowledge of information security controls, members being business risk owners, and members being rotated periodically are all desirable characteristics of an information security governance committee, but they are not the most important consideration. Members having knowledge of information security controls can help the committee to understand the technical aspects of information security and to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security program. However, having technical knowledge is not sufficient to ensure that the information security program is aligned with the organization’s business goals and strategies, and that the program considers the needs and expectations of various stakeholders. Members being business risk owners can help the committee to identify and prioritize the information security risks that affect the organization’s business objectives, and to allocate appropriate resources and responsibilities for managing those risks. However, being a business risk owner does not necessarily imply that the member has a comprehensive and balanced view of the organization’s information security needs and expectations, and that the member can represent the interests and perspectives of various functions. Members being rotated periodically can help the committee to maintain its independence and objectivity, and to avoid conflicts of interest or complacency. However, rotating members too frequently can also reduce the continuity and consistency of the information security program, and can affect the committee’s ability to monitor and evaluate the performance and progress of the information security program. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 36-37.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1014.

= Residual risk is the risk that remains after applying security controls. It reflects the actual exposure of the organization to noncompliance issues. Therefore, basing mandatory review and exception approvals on residual risk is the best approach for governing noncompliance with security requirements. It ensures that the organization is aware of the potential impact and likelihood of noncompliance and can make informed decisions about accepting, mitigating, or transferring the risk. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 78.

The results of a risk assessment would best enable an informed decision by senior management when developing a business case to justify an information security investment. A risk assessment will help to identify and prioritize the threats and vulnerabilities that affect the organization’s assets and processes, as well as the potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. A risk assessment will also provide a basis for selecting and evaluating the effectiveness of controls to mitigate the risks. According to CISA, developing a business case for security will be based on an in-depth understanding of organizational vulnerabilities, operational priorities, and return on investment1. The information security strategy, losses due to security incidents, and security investment trends in the industry are possible inputs or outputs of a risk assessment, but they are not sufficient to enable an informed decision by senior management. References: 1: The Business Case for Security - CISA 2: The Business Case for Security | CISA 3: #HowTo: Build a Business Case for Cybersecurity Investment 4: Making the Business Case for Information Security

The most effective course of action when employees are using free cloud storage services to store company data through their mobile devices is to assess the business need to provide a secure solution, such as a corporate-approved cloud service or a virtual desktop environment. Assessing the business need can help understand why employees are using free cloud storage services, what kind of data they are storing, and what are the security risks and requirements. Based on the assessment, the security manager can propose a secure solution that meets the business needs and complies with the BYOD policy. The other options, such as allowing the practice to continue, disabling remote access, or initiating remote wipe, may not address the underlying business need or may cause disruption or data loss. References:

https://www.digitalguardian.com/blog/byod-security-expert-tips-policy-mitigating-risks-preventing-breach

https://news.microsoft.com/en-xm/2021/03/18/how-to-have-secure-remote-working-with-a-byod-policy/

https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/-infosec-guide-bring-your-own-device-byod

Evacuation drills provide real-time validation of physical security measures, staff preparedness, and response time during fire-related scenarios. They test both people and systems.

“Simulated exercises are the most effective method to evaluate real-world preparedness and the adequacy of response procedures.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Security Controls Testing*

Paper reviews and awareness are useful, but only exercises reveal actual gaps in preparedness.

Isolating affected systems limits the damage and prevents the incident from impacting other parts of the organization.

“During containment, the primary objective is to isolate affected systems to prevent further damage.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Process*

Including the impact of the risk as part of regular metrics is the best way for the information security manager to help senior management understand the related risk of having many user workstations with unpatched versions of software because it quantifies and communicates the potential consequences and likelihood of such a risk in terms of business objectives and performance indicators. Recommending the security steering committee conduct a review is not a good way because it does not provide any specific information or analysis about the risk or its impact. Updating the risk assessment at regular intervals is not a good way because it does not ensure that senior management is aware or informed about the risk or its impact. Sending regular notifications directly to senior managers is not a good way because it may be perceived as intrusive or annoying, and may not convey the severity or urgency of the risk or its impact. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2015/volume-6/measuring-the-value-of-information-security-investments https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-3/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-your-information-security-management-system

When responding to a major security incident that could disrupt the business, the information security manager’s most important course of action is to follow the escalation process. The escalation process is a predefined set of steps and procedures that define who should be notified, when, how, and with what information in the event of a security incident. The escalation process helps to ensure that the appropriate stakeholders, such as senior management, business units, legal counsel, public relations, and external parties, are informed and involved in the incident response process. The escalation process also helps to coordinate the actions and decisions of the incident response team and the business continuity team, and to align the incident response objectives with the business priorities and goals. The escalation process should be documented and communicated as part of the incident response plan, and should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the changes in the organization’s structure, roles, and responsibilities.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1631

CISM 2020: Incident Management and Response, video 32

Incident Response Models3

Labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely. Security classification is a process of categoriz-ing information based on its level of sensitivity and importance, and applying appropri-ate security controls based on the level of risk associated with that infor-mation1. Labeling is a process of marking the information with the appropriate classifi-cation level, such as public, internal, confidential, secret, or top secret2. The purpose of labeling is to inform the users of the information about its value and protection re-quirements, and to guide them on how to handle it securely. Labeling can help users to:

•Identify the information they are dealing with and its classification level

•Understand their roles and responsibilities regarding the information

•Follow the security policies and procedures for the information

•Avoid unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or destruction of the information

•Report any security incidents or breaches involving the information

Labeling can also help organizations to:

•Track and monitor the information and its usage

•Enforce access controls and encryption for the information

•Audit and review the compliance with security standards and regulations for the infor-mation

•Educate and train employees and stakeholders on information security awareness and best practices

Therefore, labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely, as it increases their awareness and accountability, and supports the implementation of security measures. The other op-tions are not the primary benefits of labeling information according to its security clas-sification. Reducing the number and type of countermeasures required is not a benefit, but rather a consequence of applying security controls based on the classification lev-el. Reducing the need to identify baseline controls for each classification is not a bene-fit, but rather a prerequisite for labeling information according to its security classifica-tion. Affecting the consequences if information is handled insecurely is not a benefit, but rather a risk that needs to be managed by implementing appropriate security con-trols and incident response procedures. References: 1: Information Classification - Ad-visera 2: Information Classification in Information Security - GeeksforGeeks : Infor-mation Security Policy - NIST : Information Security Classification Framework - Queensland Government

Gaining illegal entry to a secure system by faking the sender’s address is one of the reasons why spoofing should be prevented. Spoofing is a technique that involves impersonating someone or something else to deceive or manipulate the recipient or target. Spoofing can be applied to various communication channels, such as emails, websites, phone calls, IP addresses, or DNS servers. One of the common goals of spoofing is to gain unauthorized access to a secure system by faking the sender’s address, such as an email address or an IP address. For example, an attacker may spoof an email address of a trusted person or organization and send a phishing email that contains a malicious link or attachment. If the recipient clicks on the link or opens the attachment, they may be redirected to a fake website that asks for their credentials or downloads malware onto their device. Alternatively, an attacker may spoof an IP address of a trusted source and send packets to a secure system that contains malicious code or commands. If the system accepts the packets as legitimate, it may execute the code or commands and compromise its security. Therefore, gaining illegal entry to a secure system by faking the sender’s address is one of the reasons why spoofing should be prevented.

A data classification framework (C) is the foundational step for privacy compliance because organizations must first understand what data they have, its sensitivity, and how it is regulated. Privacy obligations vary by data type (e.g., personal, sensitive, regulated), and classification enables appropriate handling, protection, retention, and access controls. Awareness training (A), SIEM (B), and DLP (D) are all valuable controls, but they are ineffective or misaligned without knowing which data requires protection and at what level. CISM governance guidance emphasizes that compliance and control selection must be risk- and data-driven, making classification an essential prerequisite for privacy programs.

 Standards are detailed statements of the minimum requirements for hardware, software, or security configurations. They are used to define the minimum security controls required for user workstations. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 69.

Data encryption standards are the best information security initiative for creating an enterprise strategy for protecting data across multiple data repositories and different departments because they help to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data in transit and at rest. Data encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable format using a secret key or algorithm, so that only authorized parties can access and decrypt it. Data encryption standards are the rules or specifications that define how data encryption should be performed, such as the type, strength, and mode of encryption, the key management and distribution methods, and the compliance requirements. Data encryption standards help to protect data from unauthorized access, modification, or theft, as well as to meet the regulatory obligations for data privacy and security. Therefore, data encryption standards are the correct answer.

A key consideration in the use of quantitative risk analysis is that it assigns numeric values to exposures of information assets, such as the probability of occurrence, the frequency of occurrence, the impact of occurrence, and the monetary value of the assets. These numeric values help to measure and compare the risks in a more objective and consistent way, and to support the decision-making process based on cost-benefit analysis. Quantitative risk analysis also requires reliable and accurate data sources, and it may involve the use of statistical tools and techniques.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Analysis, Subsection: Quantitative Risk Analysis, Page 84.

The correct answer is D because behavioral analytics tools are primarily used to detect activities that deviate from normal user or entity behavior. These tools analyze patterns such as login times, access locations, data usage, application activity, privilege use, file access, and network behavior to identify anomalies that may indicate insider threats, compromised accounts, credential misuse, or advanced attacks. Preventing data exfiltration is normally associated with data loss prevention controls, although behavioral analytics may help detect suspicious activity related to exfiltration. Analyzing external communications for malware is more closely associated with email security gateways, web gateways, sandboxing, or malware detection tools. Establishing security baselines on endpoints is more related to configuration management or endpoint protection. In CISM risk management, behavioral analytics supports monitoring, detection, and risk reduction by identifying unusual activity that may require investigation. Since its primary value is identifying behavior that differs from expected patterns, detecting anomalous user activities is the best answer.

The correct answer is D because senior management integrates security into organizational processes by establishing security policies that are aligned with business objectives. Policies communicate management’s intent, define required behavior, and provide the foundation for standards, procedures, controls, and accountability across the enterprise. When policies align with business objectives, security becomes part of how the organization operates rather than a separate technical activity. Updating process diagrams may help document processes, but documentation alone does not integrate security. Developer training is useful for application security, but it applies mainly to development teams and not all organizational processes. Training key stakeholders is valuable, but training alone does not establish mandatory enterprise-wide requirements. CISM governance principles emphasize that information security must support business goals, be directed by senior management, and be embedded into organizational structures and processes. Therefore, establishing business-aligned security policies is the best mechanism for integrating security into all organizational processes.

In the absence of technical controls, the best way to reduce unauthorized text messaging is to include the topic of prohibited texting in security awareness training . CISM recognizes that when automated or technical enforcement is unavailable, user behavior must be influenced through targeted awareness and training. Training is stronger than simple reminders because it can explain the policy requirement, business rationale, examples of prohibited behavior, consequences of noncompliance, and proper alternatives. Regular reminders of the acceptable use policy may help reinforce expectations, but they are less effective than structured training. Stopping mobile device use would likely disrupt business and may not be proportionate to the risk. Conducting a BIA is unrelated because the issue is user behavior and policy compliance, not continuity prioritization. CISM emphasizes that awareness and training programs should be tailored to specific roles, technologies, and behaviors. Therefore, incorporating prohibited texting into security awareness training is the best compensating measure when technical controls are not available.

The correct answer is D because security culture is strongly influenced by leadership behavior. Senior management must set the tone from the top by consistently demonstrating good security practices, following policies, supporting security initiatives, and making risk-aware decisions. Employees are more likely to adopt secure behavior when they see executives and managers treating security as a business priority. Approving security policies is important, but approval alone does not create culture unless leaders also model expected behavior. Reviewing budget and resources supports the program, but it does not directly shape everyday security behavior. Participating in security training is positive and visible, but demonstrating good security practices on an ongoing basis has a broader cultural impact. In CISM governance, management commitment, accountability, communication, and example-setting are essential for embedding information security into the organization’s values and operations. Therefore, leadership behavior is the most important factor in improving information security culture.

 A gap analysis is a process of comparing the current state of an organization’s security posture with the desired or required state, and identifying the gaps or discrepancies that need to be addressed. A gap analysis helps to determine the current level of compliance with relevant regulations, standards, and best practices, and to prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve the desired level of compliance1. A gap analysis should be performed first when developing a security strategy in support of a new service that is subject to regulations, because it provides the following benefits2:

It helps to understand the scope and impact of the new service on the organization’s security objectives, risks, and controls.

It helps to identify the legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements that apply to the new service, and the potential penalties or consequences of non-compliance.

It helps to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing security controls, and to identify the gaps or weaknesses that need to be remediated or enhanced.

It helps to align the security strategy with the business goals and objectives of the new service, and to ensure the security strategy is consistent and coherent across the organization.

It helps to communicate the security requirements and expectations to the stakeholders involved in the new service, and to obtain their support and commitment.

The other options, such as determining security controls for the new service, establishing a compliance program, or hiring new resources to support the service, are not the first steps when developing a security strategy in support of a new service that is subject to regulations, because they depend on the results and recommendations of the gap analysis. Determining security controls for the new service requires a clear understanding of the security requirements and risks associated with the new service, which can be obtained from the gap analysis. Establishing a compliance program requires a systematic and structured approach to implement, monitor, and improve the security controls and processes that ensure compliance, which can be based on the gap analysis. Hiring new resources to support the service requires a realistic and justified estimation of the human and financial resources needed to achieve the security objectives and compliance, which can be derived from the gap analysis. References = 1: What is a Gap Analysis? | Smartsheet 2: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 121 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 122 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 123 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 124 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 125

Learn more:

1. infosectrain.com2. resources.infosecinstitute.com3. resources.infosecinstitute.com4. resources.infosecinstitute.com+2 more

A parallel test is the best method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required. A parallel test involves processing the same transactions or data at both the primary and the alternate site simultaneously, and comparing the results for accuracy and consistency. A parallel test can validate the functionality, performance, and reliability of the alternate site without disrupting the normal operations at the primary site. A parallel test can also identify and resolve any issues or discrepancies between the two sites before a real disaster occurs. A parallel test can provide a high level of assurance and confidence that the alternate site can support the organization’s continuity requirements.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Business Continuity Plan (BCP) Testing, page 1861; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 56, page 522.

A parallel test is the best method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required because it involves processing data at both the primary and alternate sites simultaneously without disrupting the normal operations1. A full interruption test would cause downtime and potential loss of data or revenue2. A simulation test would not provide a realistic assessment of the alternate site’s capabilities3. A tabletop test would only involve a discussion of the procedures and scenarios without actually testing the site4.

1: CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA 2: CISM - ISACA Certified Information Security Manager Exam Prep - NICCS 3: Prepare for the ISACA Certified Information Security Manager Exam: CISM … 4: CISM: Certified Information Systems Manager | Official ISACA … - NICCS

Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with business objectives and consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In addition to executive sponsorship and business alignment, a critical factor for effective information security governance is ownership of security, which means that the roles and responsibilities for information security are clearly defined and assigned to the appropriate stakeholders, such as business owners, information owners, information custodians, and users. Ownership of security also implies accountability for the protection of information assets and the management of security risks. References: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cism https://www.nist.gov/publications/information-security-handbook-guide-managers

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring the objectives of an information security framework are being met belongs to the board of directors, as they are accountable for the governance of the organization and the oversight of the information security strategy. The board of directors should ensure that the information security framework aligns with the business objectives, supports the business processes, and complies with the legal and regulatory requirements. The board of directors should also monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security framework and provide guidance and direction for its improvement.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Enterprise Governance, Subsection: Board of Directors, Page 18.

The first thing that the information security manager should do after reading about a vendor product compromise on social media is to validate the risk to the organization. This means verifying the source and credibility of the information, determining if the organization uses the affected product, and assessing the potential impact and likelihood of the compromise on the organization’s data and systems. Validating the risk to the organization will help the information security manager to decide on the appropriate course of action, such as activating the incident response program, notifying relevant stakeholders, or performing a BIA.

The business value of an information asset is derived from its criticality, which is the degree of importance or dependency of the asset to the organization’s objectives, operations, and stakeholders. The criticality of an information asset can be determined by assessing its impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of the information, as well as its sensitivity, classification, and regulatory requirements. The higher the criticality of an information asset, the higher its business value, and the more resources and controls are needed to protect it.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 371; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.32; IT Asset Valuation, Risk Assessment and Control Implementation Model1; Managing Data as an Asset3

The information security manager should first obtain legal guidance when there is a conflict between the organization’s information security policy and a local regulation, because this will help to understand the implications and consequences of the conflict, and to identify the possible options and solutions for resolving it. The information security manager should also consult with the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, and information owners, to determine the best course of action that aligns with the organization’s objectives, risk appetite, and compliance obligations. Enforcing the local regulation or the organization’s information security policy without legal guidance may expose the organization to legal liabilities, security risks, or operational disruptions. Obtaining an independent assessment of the regulation may be helpful, but it is not the first step to take.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 691; A Guide to ISACA CISM Domains & Domain 1: Information Security Governance2

The primary objective of a cyber resilience strategy is business continuity (B). In CISM, cyber resilience is defined as the organization’s ability to prepare for, respond to, recover from, and adapt to adverse cyber events while continuing to deliver critical business services. The focus is not on preventing all incidents—which is unrealistic—but on ensuring that essential operations can continue or be restored within acceptable timeframes despite cyber disruptions.

Employee awareness (A) and executive support (C) are important enablers of resilience, but they are means, not the ultimate objective. Regulatory compliance (D) is a governance requirement, but compliance alone does not guarantee operational resilience. CISM emphasizes that resilience strategies are driven by business impact analysis (BIA) results, recovery objectives, and tolerance for disruption, all of which directly support continuity of critical services.

A cyber resilience strategy integrates incident response, disaster recovery, backup, redundancy, and crisis management to minimize operational impact. Therefore, ensuring business continuity and operational resilience is the core objective against which cyber resilience effectiveness is measured.

The core objective of a post-incident review (PIR) is to identify gaps and weaknesses in the response process. This includes missteps, delays, communication failures, or policy limitations — all of which provide insight to improve future incident handling.

" Post-incident reviews focus on identifying root causes and areas for improvement to enhance the organization’s preparedness for future incidents.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Post-Incident Activities*

Though training, reporting, and budgeting may follow, they are secondary outcomes of this process.

 Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with and support business objectives, are consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and are effectively managed. By aligning information security governance with corporate governance, the organization can ensure that information security is integrated into the business processes and decision making, and that the information security risks and opportunities are properly identified, assessed, and addressed. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.1

Analyzing how security policies and practices are integrated into business processes (B) provides the clearest view of governance effectiveness. CISM defines governance as the alignment of security with business objectives, supported by defined roles, accountability, and decision-making structures. BIAs (A) and risk analyses (C) provide valuable inputs but do not directly assess governance maturity. Interviews (D) can supplement understanding but are subjective without observing real integration. By evaluating whether security is embedded in procurement, development, operations, and decision workflows, a new security manager can determine whether governance is formalized, consistently applied, and supported by management.

The correct answer is A because an untested business continuity plan creates immediate uncertainty about whether the organization can continue or recover critical operations during a disruption. For an e-commerce business, downtime can quickly affect revenue, customer trust, regulatory obligations, and service availability. Testing validates whether recovery procedures, people, technologies, communications, dependencies, and recovery objectives are realistic and achievable. A recovery test exceeding budget expectations is a concern, but it does not necessarily mean the organization cannot recover. A delayed business impact analysis is important because BIA supports continuity planning, but the immediate operational concern is that the plan has not been validated. A lack of recent audit may reduce assurance, but an audit is not a substitute for testing. In CISM, continuity and recovery capabilities must be tested to confirm readiness and identify weaknesses before a real incident occurs. Therefore, the absence of recent BCP testing is the most immediate concern.

The greatest business benefit of an incident response plan is minimizing the negative impact of disruptive incidents on operations and reputation.

“The primary business objective of an incident response plan is to minimize the impact of incidents on business operations and assets.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Plan Objectives*

ISACA practice questions reinforce that limiting impact is the key outcome from a business perspective.

The correct answer is D because an unannounced disaster recovery exercise is primarily intended to evaluate how personnel respond under realistic and unexpected conditions. Unlike scheduled exercises, unannounced tests help determine whether staff understand their roles, follow procedures, communicate effectively, and make appropriate decisions when there is no advance preparation. This type of exercise can reveal weaknesses in readiness, escalation, coordination, and practical response behavior. Assessing service level agreements may be a secondary benefit, but it is not the main purpose of an unannounced exercise. Providing metrics to senior management is useful for reporting, but metrics are an output of the exercise, not the primary objective. Estimating the recovery time objective is incorrect because the RTO should already be established through business impact analysis and business requirements; testing helps validate whether the RTO can be met. In CISM practice, disaster recovery and incident exercises are used to validate preparedness, response capability, and organizational resilience.

Before conducting full-functional continuity testing, an information security manager should verify that teams and individuals responsible for recovery have been identified and trained on their roles and responsibilities. This will ensure that the testing can be executed effectively and efficiently, as well as identify any gaps or issues in the recovery process. Risk acceptance by the business, copies of plans kept offsite and plans documented in simple language are all good practices for continuity management, but they are not as important as having clear roles and responsibilities defined before testing.

 Server-based malware protection is not enforced is the issue that would be of GREATEST concern to an information security manager, as it exposes the web-based application and its data to potential threats from malicious software that can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information. Server-based malware protection is a security control that monitors and blocks malicious activities on the server where the application runs, such as viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, etc. Without server-based malware protection, the web-based application may be vulnerable to attacks that can damage or destroy the data stored on the server, or disrupt the normal functioning of the application. The other issues are also important, but not as critical as server-based malware protection. The application does not use a secure communications protocol may expose sensitive data in transit to eavesdropping or interception by unauthorized parties. The application is configured with restrictive access controls may limit the access rights of legitimate users to authorized resources, but it does not prevent unauthorized users from accessing them through other means. The business process has only one level of error checking may result in incorrect or inconsistent data entry or processing, but it does not guarantee data quality or accuracy. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1751; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 812

The information security manager’s best course of action is to report the findings of the risk assessment to the key stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, and regulators. This will ensure that the stakeholders are aware of the potential impact of the risk and can make informed decisions on how to address it. The other options are possible actions to take after reporting the findings, but they are not the best course of action in this scenario.

References = CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update] (section: Information Risk Response) and CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA (page 6, item example 2)

The correct answer is B because the purpose of risk treatment is to bring risk within the organization’s acceptable level, based on risk appetite and risk tolerance. Risk treatment may involve mitigating, avoiding, transferring, or accepting risk. The objective is not simply to focus on inherent and residual risk as concepts, but to select and apply treatment options that reduce or manage risk to a level approved by the organization. Asset criticality is an important input because more critical assets may require stronger controls, but it is not the primary purpose of treatment. High- and medium-rated risks often receive priority, but risk treatment should still be based on business impact, likelihood, cost, risk appetite, and treatment effectiveness. Inherent and residual risk must be understood, but they describe risk before and after controls rather than the main focus of selecting treatment. CISM risk management principles emphasize that management must choose treatment options that align risk with business objectives and acceptable risk levels.

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are measurable values that demonstrate how effectively an organization is achieving its key objectives and goals. KPIs can help senior management understand the status of information security compliance by providing quantifiable and relevant data on the performance and progress of the information security program and processes. KPIs can also help senior management to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security controls and activities, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make informed decisions and adjustments. KPIs should be aligned with the organization’s strategy, vision, and mission, and should be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound). Some examples of information security KPIs are: percentage of compliance with policies and standards, number of security incidents and breaches, mean time to detect and respond to incidents, percentage of systems and applications patched, number of security awareness trainings completed, etc.

Industry benchmarks, business impact analysis (BIA) results, and risk assessment results are not the most useful to help senior management understand the status of information security compliance, although they may provide some useful information or insights. Industry benchmarks are comparative measures of the performance or practices of other organizations in the same industry or sector. Industry benchmarks can help senior management to compare and contrast their own information security performance or practices with those of their peers or competitors, and identify gaps or opportunities for improvement. However, industry benchmarks may not reflect the specific goals, needs, or context of the organization, and may not be readily available or reliable. Business impact analysis (BIA) results are the outcomes of the process of analyzing the potential impacts of disruptive events on the organization’s critical business functions and processes. BIA results can help senior management to understand the dependencies, priorities, and recovery objectives of the organization’s business functions and processes, and to plan for business continuity and disaster recovery. However, BIA results do not directly measure or indicate the status of information security compliance, and may not be updated or accurate. Risk assessment results are the outcomes of the process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that the organization faces. Risk assessment results can help senior management to understand the sources, causes, and consequences of information security risks, and to determine the appropriate risk responses and controls. However, risk assessment results do not directly measure or indicate the status of information security compliance, and may vary depending on the risk assessment methodology, criteria, and frequency. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 47-481, 54-551, 69-701, 72-731; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 832

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics that measure the effectiveness and ef-ficiency of information security processes and activities. They help senior manage-ment understand the status of information security compliance by providing relevant, timely and accurate information on the performance of security controls, the level of risk exposure, the return on security investment and the progress toward security ob-jectives. KPIs can also be used to benchmark the organization’s security performance against industry standards or best practices. KPIs should be aligned with the organiza-tion’s strategic goals and risk appetite, and should be reported regularly to senior man-agement and other stakeholders.

This answer best indicates the effectiveness of the vendor risk management process because it shows that the organization has established and enforced clear and consistent security requirements and expectations for its vendors, and that the vendors have demonstrated their compliance and commitment to security best practices. A globally recognized security standard, such as ISO 27001, NIST CSF, or COBIT, provides a comprehensive and objective framework for assessing and improving the security posture and performance of vendors.

An information security steering committee is a group of senior executives and managers from different business units and functions who provide strategic direction, oversight, and support for the information security program. The most important function of the committee is to obtain multiple perspectives from the business, as this helps to ensure that the information security program aligns with the business goals, needs, and culture, and that the security decisions reflect the interests and expectations of the stakeholders.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 331; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Knowledge Statement 1.22; Improve Security Governance With a Security Steering Committee2; The Role of the Corporate Information Security Steering Committee3

 The most appropriate time to conduct a disaster recovery test would be after the business continuity plan (BCP) has been updated, as it ensures that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is aligned with the current business requirements, objectives, and priorities. The BCP should be updated regularly to reflect any changes in the business environment, such as new threats, risks, processes, technologies, or regulations. The disaster recovery test should validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the DRP, as well as identify any gaps, issues, or improvement opportunities123. References =

1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2114

2: CISM Practice Quiz, question 1042

3: Business Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery Testing, section “Testing the Plan”

After an intrusion has been detected and contained, the system should be recovered to a known and trusted state. The best practice for ensuring the integrity of the recovered system is to install the OS, patches, and application from the original source, such as the vendor’s website or media. This way, any malicious code or backdoors that may have been inserted by the intruder can be eliminated. Restoring the OS, patches, and application from a backup may not guarantee the integrity of the system, as the backup may have been compromised or outdated. Restoring the application and data from a forensic copy may preserve the evidence of the intrusion, but it may also reintroduce the vulnerability or malware that allowed the intrusion in the first place. Removing all signs of the intrusion from the OS and application may not be sufficient or feasible, as the intruder may have made subtle or hidden changes that are difficult to detect or undo.

References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 2401

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, 2020, question ID 2132

The BEST practice for ensuring the integrity of the recovered system after an intrusion is to restore the OS, patches, and application from a backup. This will ensure that the system is in a known good state, without any potential residual malicious code or changes from the intrusion. Restoring from a backup also enables the organization to revert to a previous configuration that has been tested and known to be secure. This step should be taken prior to conducting a thorough investigation and forensic analysis to determine the cause and extent of the intrusion.

An organization is most likely to accept the risk of noncompliance with a new regulatory requirement when the cost of complying with the regulation exceeds the potential penalties. In such cases, from a cost-benefit perspective, the organization might find it more economical to absorb potential fines or penalties rather than implementing costly controls or processes to comply with the regulation.

“Risk acceptance occurs when the cost of mitigating or transferring the risk exceeds the benefit of the mitigation. This also applies to regulatory noncompliance if the penalties are less than the costs of compliance.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment Options*

ISACA’s practice questions highlight that risk acceptance is a legitimate treatment when costs outweigh potential penalties or impact.

According to the CISM Manual, the information security manager should first assess the risk to business operations before taking any other action. This will help to prioritize the issues and determine the appropriate response. Performing a vulnerability assessment, a gap analysis, or creating a security exception are possible actions, but they should be based on the risk assessment results. References = CISM Manual, 5th Edition, page 1211; CISM Practice Quiz, question 32

The most important measure of a security investment’s success is whether it delivers the anticipated risk reduction (D). CISM emphasizes that security investments are justified primarily by their ability to lower risk to within acceptable tolerance, not by compliance or financial return alone. Internal requirements (A) and standards compliance (B) are important but do not guarantee risk reduction. Financial benefits (C) are often indirect in security. Post-implementation reviews should validate whether the original risk assumptions were correct and whether residual risk aligns with management expectations.

The first thing that should be done when a SIEM flags a potential event is A. Validate the event is not a false positive. This is because a false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. False positives can waste the time and resources of the security team, and reduce the trust and confidence in the SIEM system. Therefore, it is important to verify the accuracy and validity of the event before initiating any further actions, such as incident response, escalation, or compensating controls. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise.

A false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 2091; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 72, page 19

The first course of action is to identify applicable regulatory requirements (D). CISM governance requires understanding legal and regulatory obligations before defining policies, controls, or technical measures. Encryption (B), training (A), and policy updates (C) must be based on regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid legal exposure. Jurisdictional risk assessment is foundational when operating across borders.

The correct answer is D because system-level risk is calculated or assessed by considering threats, vulnerabilities, likelihood, impact, and existing controls related to a specific system. Vulnerabilities are weaknesses that may be exploited by threats and are therefore direct inputs into determining risk. Key risk indicators are useful for monitoring changes in risk exposure over time, but they are generally reporting or monitoring measures rather than primary calculation inputs. A business impact analysis helps determine the effect of disruption on business processes and may support impact evaluation, but it is not by itself a system-level risk input. System risk appetite defines how much risk may be acceptable, but it does not calculate the risk itself; it is used to evaluate whether calculated or assessed risk is acceptable. In CISM risk management, risk assessment requires identifying assets, threats, vulnerabilities, likelihood, impact, and controls. Since vulnerabilities directly influence the likelihood and potential success of exploitation, system vulnerabilities are the best answer.

The primary objective of performing a vulnerability assessment following a business system update is to review the effectiveness of controls. A vulnerability assessment is a systematic review of security weaknesses in an information system. It evaluates if the system is susceptible to any known vulnerabilities, assigns severity levels to those vulnerabilities, and recommends remediation or mitigation, if and whenever needed1. A business system update is a process of modifying or enhancing an information system to improve its functionality, performance, security, or compatibility. A business system update may introduce new features, fix bugs, patch vulnerabilities, or comply with new standards or regulations2. Performing a vulnerability assessment following a business system update is important because it helps to:

•Review the effectiveness of controls that are implemented to protect the information sys-tem from threats and risks

•Identify any new or residual vulnerabilities that may have been introduced or exposed by the update

•Evaluate the impact and likelihood of potential incidents that may exploit the vulnerabili-ties

•Prioritize and implement appropriate actions to address the vulnerabilities

•Verify and validate the security posture and compliance of the updated information sys-tem

Therefore, the primary objective of performing a vulnerability assessment following a business system update is to review the effectiveness of controls that are designed to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information system and its data. The other options are not the primary objectives of performing a vulnerability as-sessment following a business system update. Determining operational losses is not an objective, but rather a possible consequence of not performing a vulnerability as-sessment or not addressing the identified vulnerabilities. Improving the change control process is not an objective, but rather a possible outcome of performing a vulnerability assessment and incorporating its results and recommendations into the change man-agement cycle. Updating the threat landscape is not an objective, but rather a prereq-uisite for performing a vulnerability assessment that requires using up-to-date sources of threat intelligence and vulnerability information. References: 1: Vulnerability As-sessment - NIST 2: System Update - Techopedia : Vulnerability Assessment vs Penetra-tion Testing - Imperva : Change Control Process - NIST : Threat Landscape - NIST

Integrating security activities within the development process is the best option to lower the cost to implement application security controls because it ensures that security is considered and addressed throughout the software development life cycle (SDLC), from design to deployment, and reduces the likelihood and impact of security flaws or vulnerabilities that may require costly fixes or patches later on. Performing security tests in the development environment is not the best option because it may not detect or prevent all security issues that may arise in different environments or scenarios. Performing a risk analysis after project completion is not a good option because it may be too late to identify or mitigate security risks that may have been introduced during the project. Including standard application security requirements is not a good option because it may not account for specific or unique security needs or challenges of different applications or projects. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/secure-software-development-lifecycle https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems

Penetration testing is the most useful method for identifying security control gaps on an application server because it simulates real-world attacks and exploits the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of the application server. Penetration testing can reveal the actual impact and risk of the security control gaps, and provide recommendations for remediation and improvement.

The information security training policy ensures that everyone within the organization, including contractors and third-party users, receives the appropriate level of security awareness and training. This policy defines how the organization communicates its security requirements, expectations, and best practices.

“Information security training policies and programs ensure that all personnel are aware of and understand the security requirements and their individual responsibilities.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Security Awareness and Training

The ISACA CISM practice questions emphasize that a clear training policy is the best way to communicate security practices to all involved parties.

The risk owner (A) is best positioned to approve specific risk treatment options because they are accountable for the business process or asset affected by the risk and ultimately bear the consequences of that decision. CISM clearly distinguishes between roles that advise on risk (e.g., information security manager, risk management function) and those that own and accept risk. Senior management (D) defines risk appetite and tolerance, but day-to-day treatment decisions are delegated to risk owners within those boundaries. Approving treatment options requires an understanding of operational impact, cost, and business value—making the risk owner the appropriate authority.

The primary purpose for continuous monitoring of security controls is to ensure the effectiveness of controls. This involves regularly assessing the controls to ensure that they are meeting their intended objectives, and that any potential weaknesses are identified and addressed. Continuous monitoring also helps to ensure that control gaps are minimized, and that systems are available and aligned with compliance requirements.

The primary purpose of continuous monitoring of security controls is to ensure that the controls are operating effectively and providing adequate protection for the information assets. Continuous monitoring can also help to identify control gaps, ensure system availability, and support compliance requirements, but these are secondary benefits12 References = 1: SP 800-137, Information Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM) for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, page 1-12: A Practical Approach to Continuous Control Monitoring, ISACA Journal, Volume 2, 2015, page 1.

The greatest benefit of conducting an organization-wide security awareness program is to improve the security behavior of the employees, contractors, partners, and other stakeholders who interact with the organization’s information assets. Security behavior refers to the actions and decisions that affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information, such as following the security policies and procedures, reporting security incidents, avoiding risky practices, and applying security controls. By improving the security behavior, the organization can reduce the human-related risks and vulnerabilities, enhance the security culture and awareness, and support the security strategy and objectives.

The other options are not as beneficial as improving the security behavior, although they may also be outcomes or objectives of a security awareness program. Promoting the security strategy is important to communicate the vision, mission, and goals of the security function, as well as to align the security activities with the business needs and expectations. However, promoting the security strategy alone is not enough to ensure its implementation and effectiveness, as it also requires the involvement and commitment of the stakeholders, especially the senior management. Reporting fewer security incidents may indicate a lower level of security breaches or threats, but it may also reflect a lack of detection, reporting, or awareness mechanisms. Moreover, reporting fewer security incidents is not a reliable measure of the security performance or maturity, as it does not account for the impact, severity, or root causes of the incidents. Detecting more security incidents may indicate a higher level of security monitoring, alerting, or awareness capabilities, but it may also reflect a higher level of security exposures or attacks. Moreover, detecting more security incidents is not a desirable goal of a security awareness program, as it also implies a higher level of security incidents that need to be responded to and resolved. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 201-202, 207-208.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1006.

The Benefits of Information Security and Privacy Awareness Training Programs, ISACA Journal, Volume 1, 2019, 1.

 = Identification of risk is the first and most important step in the IT risk management process, especially when the organization is undergoing a digital transformation that introduces new technologies, processes, and business models. Identification of risk involves determining the sources, causes, and potential consequences of IT-related risks that may affect the organization’s objectives, assets, and stakeholders. Identification of risk also helps to establish the risk context, scope, and criteria for the subsequent risk analysis, evaluation, and treatment. Without identifying the risks, the information security manager cannot effectively assess the risk exposure, prioritize the risks, implement appropriate controls, monitor the risk performance, or communicate the risk information to the relevant parties.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Identification, page 841; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 34, page 352.

The PRIMARY purpose of an acceptable use policy is to protect the organization from misuse of information assets, such as data, hardware, software, and network resources, by defining the rules and expectations for the authorized and appropriate use of these assets by the users. An acceptable use policy helps to prevent or reduce the risks of security breaches, legal liabilities, reputational damage, or loss of productivity that may result from unauthorized, inappropriate, or unethical use of information assets.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 74: “An acceptable use policy is a policy that establishes an agreement between users and the enterprise that defines, for all parties, the ranges of use that are approved before gaining access to a network or the Internet.”

The essentials of an acceptable use policy - Infosec Resources: “An Acceptable Use Policy (henceforward mentioned as " AUP " ) is agreement between two or more parties to a computer network community, expressing in writing their intent to adhere to certain standards of behaviour with respect to the proper usage of specific hardware & software services.”

Acceptable use policy template - Workable: “This Acceptable Use Policy sets the minimum requirements for the use of our company’s IT resources, including computers, networks, devices, software, and internet. It aims to protect our company and our employees from harm and liability, and to ensure that our IT resources are used appropriately, productively, and securely.”

A data loss prevention (DLP) solution is a type of detective control that monitors and prevents unauthorized transmission or leakage of sensitive data from the organization. A DLP solution can enhance the organization’s antivirus controls by detecting and blocking malicious code that attempts to exfiltrate data, but this is not its main benefit. A DLP solution cannot eliminate the risk of data loss, as there may be other sources of data loss that are not covered by the DLP solution, such as physical theft, accidental deletion, or natural disasters. A DLP solution also does not reduce the need for a security awareness program, as human factors are often the root cause of data loss incidents. A security awareness program can educate and motivate employees to follow security policies and best practices, and to report any suspicious or anomalous activities. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 79.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1003.

The primary benefit of a vulnerability scanning tool is identifying potential risks posed by devices on the network . Vulnerability scanning detects known technical weaknesses in systems, applications, services, and configurations. These weaknesses may expose the organization to threats and therefore represent potential sources of risk. CISM distinguishes vulnerability identification from full risk analysis: scanning provides technical input, but risk analysis also requires evaluating likelihood, impact, asset value, and business context. A vulnerability scanner does not identify weaknesses in organizational processes, which usually require audits, assessments, or process reviews. It also cannot ensure that complex vulnerabilities are never missed, since scanning tools depend on coverage, signatures, configuration, and scope. Finally, it does not automate the complete risk analysis program; it only supplies data for risk evaluation. CISM risk management guidance emphasizes that vulnerability information must be interpreted in relation to business impact and threat exposure. Therefore, the best answer is identifying potential risks associated with networked devices.

The program goals are communicated and understood by the organization is the most important factor for the effective implementation of an information security governance program because it ensures that the program is aligned with the business objectives and supported by the stakeholders. Employees receive customized information security training is not the most important factor, but rather a means to achieve the program goals and raise awareness among the staff. The program budget is approved and monitored by senior management is not the most important factor, but rather a resource to enable the program activities and measure its performance. Information security roles and responsibilities are documented is not the most important factor, but rather a way to define and assign the program tasks and accountabilities. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2015/volume-1/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-information-security-governance https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

The correct answer is B because containerization separates corporate data and applications from personal data and applications on a mobile device. In a bring your own device environment, the organization does not fully control the endpoint because it is personally owned and may be used on untrusted networks or with unmanaged applications. A containerization solution helps protect enterprise information by enforcing encryption, access controls, remote wipe, data sharing restrictions, and policy controls within the corporate container. An acceptable use policy is important, but it is administrative and does not technically protect data stored on the device. Data loss prevention can help detect or block unauthorized data movement, but it may not provide the same direct separation and control over mobile data. A device certification process helps assess device suitability, but certification alone does not secure corporate data after deployment. In CISM, controls should be selected based on risk and effectiveness. Containerization is the strongest option for protecting corporate data on unsecured BYOD devices.

The best way to ensure continuous compliance with security requirements is to conduct periodic reviews of the vendor’s third-party accredited assessments (B). From a CISM governance and third-party risk management perspective, ongoing assurance is critical when business-critical functions are outsourced. Independent third-party assessments (such as SOC reports or equivalent accredited reviews) provide objective, repeatable, and evidence-based validation that security controls are not only defined but are operating effectively over time.

Training programs (A) improve awareness but do not provide assurance of compliance. Establishing right-to-audit clauses (C) is an important contractual safeguard, but it is typically reactive or periodic, not a continuous monitoring mechanism. Re-approving contract clauses (D) ensures contractual relevance but does not validate actual control effectiveness.

CISM emphasizes that continuous vendor compliance is best achieved through independent assurance mechanisms integrated into ongoing vendor oversight, enabling management to monitor control effectiveness, identify emerging risks, and take timely corrective action. Periodic review of accredited third-party assessments supports governance transparency, accountability, and alignment with the organization’s risk appetite.

The best way to ensure that information security concerns are considered during the procurement of SaaS solutions is to integrate information security risk assessments into the procurement process. This will allow the organization to identify and evaluate the potential security risks and impacts of using a SaaS provider, and to select the most appropriate solution based on the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization. Information security risk assessments should be conducted at the early stages of the procurement process, before selecting a vendor or signing a contract, and should be updated periodically throughout the contract lifecycle.

Providing regular information security training to the procurement team (B) is a good practice, but it may not be sufficient to address the specific security issues and challenges of SaaS solutions. The procurement team may not have the expertise or the authority to conduct information security risk assessments or to negotiate security requirements with the vendors.

Inviting IT members into regular procurement team meetings to influence best practice © is also a good practice, but it may not be effective if the IT members are not involved in the actual procurement process or decision making. The IT members may not have the opportunity or the influence to conduct information security risk assessments or to ensure that security concerns are adequately addressed in the procurement contracts.

Enforcing the right to audit in procurement contracts with SaaS vendors (D) is an important control, but it is not the most effective way to ensure that information security concerns are considered during the procurement process. The right to audit is a post-contractual measure that allows the organization to verify the security controls and compliance of the SaaS provider, but it does not prevent or mitigate the security risks that may arise from using a SaaS solution. The right to audit should be complemented by information security risk assessments and other security requirements in the procurement contracts.

References = CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Management, Subsection: Procurement and Vendor Management, Page 141-1421

Organizational units contribute to and agree on priorities is the best way to facilitate effective strategic alignment of security initiatives because it ensures that the security initiatives are aligned with the business goals and objectives, supported by relevant stakeholders, and prioritized based on risk and value. The business strategy is periodically updated is not sufficient to facilitate effective strategic alignment of security initiatives because it does not involve collaboration or communication between different organizational units. Procedures and standards are approved by department heads is not sufficient to facilitate effective strategic alignment of security initiatives because it does not reflect the strategic direction or vision of the organization. Periodic security audits are conducted by a third-party is not sufficient to facilitate effective strategic alignment of security initiatives because it does not address the planning or implementation of security initiatives. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2015/volume-1/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-information-security-governance

Enforcing technical security standards is the most effective way to ensure that a new server is appropriately secured because it ensures that the server complies with the organization’s security policies and best practices, such as encryption, authentication, patching, and hardening. Performing secure code reviews is not relevant for securing a new server, unless it is running custom applications that need to be verified for security flaws. Conducting penetration testing is not sufficient for securing a new server, because it only identifies vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers, but does not fix them. Initiating security scanning is not sufficient for securing a new server, because it only detects known vulnerabilities or misconfigurations, but does not enforce security standards or remediate issues. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-3/secure-code-review https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

The change management procedure that is MOST likely to cause concern to the information security manager is the development manager migrating programs into production, because it involves a high-risk activity that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information systems and data. Migrating programs into production without proper testing, validation, and approval could introduce errors, vulnerabilities, or conflicts that could affect the performance, functionality, or security of the systems. Fallback processes are tested the weekend before changes are made, users are not notified of scheduled system changes, and a manual rather than an automated process is used to compare program versions are all acceptable change management procedures that do not pose significant risks to the information security manager. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 3121; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1522