A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
switch [HTTP::uri] {
"/WS1/ws.jsp" {
log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"
pool JSP
}
default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"
pool NonJSP
}
}
}
However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
What is the problem?
An LTM Specialist has just captured trace /var/tmp/trace.cap for site www.example.com while listening on virtual address 10.0.0.1:443 configured on partition ApplicationA. The data payload being captured is SSL encrypted.
Which command should the LTM Specialist execute to decrypt the data payload?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist sets up AVR alerts and notifications for a specific virtual server if the server latency exceeds 50ms. The LTM Specialist simulates a fault so that the server latency is consistently exceeding the 50ms threshold; however, no alerts are being received.
Which configuration should the LTM Specialist modify to achieve the expected results?
An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with a new virtual server. When connecting through the virtual server, clients receive the message "The connection was reset" in the browser, although connections directly to the pool member show the application is functioning correctly.
ltm pool srv1_https_pool {
members {
192.168.2.1:https{
address 192.168.2.1
}
}
}
ltm virtual https_example_vs {
destination 192.168.1.155:https
ip-protocol tcp
mask 255.255.255.255
pool srv1_https_pool
profiles {
http { }
tcp { }
}
snat automap
vlans-disabled
}
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?
An LTM Specialist is customizing local traffic logging.
Which traffic management OS alert level provides the most detail?
Which two items can be logged by the Application Visibility Reporting analytics profile? (Choose two.)
An LTM Specialist configured a virtual server to load balance a custom application. The application works when it is tested from within the firewall but it fails when tested externally. The pool member address is 192.168.200.10:80. A capture from an external client shows:
GET /index.jsp HTTP/1.1
Host: 207.206.201.100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Connection: keep-alive
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
DatE. Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:09:55 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS)
Location: http://192.168.200.10/user/home.jsp
Content-LengtH. 304
Connection: close
What is the solution to this issue?
What is the correct command to reset an LTM device to its default settings?
An LTM Specialist is tasked with ensuring that the syslogs for the LTM device are sent to a remote syslog server.
The following is an extract from the config file detailing the node and monitor that the LTM device is using for the
remote syslog server:
monitor
Syslog_15002 {
defaults from udp
dest *:15002
}
node 91.223.45.231 {
monitor Syslog_15002
screen RemoteSYSLOG
}
There seem to be problems communicating with the remote syslog server. However, the pool monitor shows that the remote server is up.
The network department has confirmed that there are no firewall rules or networking issues preventing the LTM device from
communicating with the syslog server. The department responsible for the remote syslog server indicates that there may
be problems with the syslog server. The LTM Specialist checks the BIG-IP LTM logs for errors relating to the remote syslog
server. None are found. The LTM Specialist does a tcpdump:
tcpdump -nn port 15002, with the following results:
21:28:36.395543 IP 192.168.100.100.44772 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 19
21:28:36.429073 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.430714 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:36.840524 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 169
21:28:36.846547 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 181
21:28:39.886343 IP 192.168.100.100.39499 > 91.223.45.231.15002: UDP, length 144
NotE. 192.168.100.100 is the self IP of the LTM device.
Why are there no errors for the remote syslog server in the log files?
Which procedure should an LTM Specialist follow to move a configuration from a 1500 to a 1600 hardware platform during an upgrade?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is performing an HTTP trace on the client side of the LTM device and notices there are many undesired headers being sent by the server in the response. The LTM Specialist wants to remove all response headers except "Set-Cookie" and "Location."
How should the LTM Specialist modify the HTTP profile to remove undesired headers from the HTTP response?
In preparation for a maintenance task, an LTM Specialist performs a "Force to Standby" on LTM device Unit 1. LTM device Unit 2 becomes active as expected. The maintenance task requires the reboot of Unit 1. Shortly after the reboot is complete, the LTM Specialist discovers that Unit 1 has become active and Unit 2 has returned to standby.
What would cause this behavior?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
A client attempts to connect from a Google Chrome browser to a virtual server on a BIG-IP LTM. The virtual server is SSL Offloaded. When the client connects, the client receives an SSL error. After trying Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer browsers, the client still receives the same errors.
The LTM Specialist does an ssldump on the virtual server and receives the results as per the exhibit.
What is the problem?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth usage?
An LTM Specialist wants to allow access to the Always On Management (AOM) from the network.
Which two methods should the LTM Specialist use to configure the AOM interface? (Choose two.)
Given the log entry:
011f0005:3: HTTP header (32800) exceeded maximum allowed size of 32768 (Client sidE. vip=/Common/VS_web profile=http pool=/Common/POOL_web client_ip=10.0.0.1)
Which HTTP profile setting can be modified temporarily to resolve the issue?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
Users receive an error when attempting to connect to the website https://website.com. The website has a DNS record of 195.56.67.90. The upstream ISP has confirmed that there is nothing wrong with the routing between the user and the LTM device.
The following tcpdump outputs have been captured:
External Vlan, filtered on IP 168.210.232.5
00:25:07.598519 IP 168.210.232.5.33159 > 195.56.67.90.https: S 1920647964:1920647964(0) win 8192
00:25:07.598537 IP 195.56.67.90.https > 168.210.232.5.33159: S 2690691360:2690691360(0) ack 1920647965 win 4350
00:25:07.598851 IP 168.210.232.5.33160 > 195.56.67.90.https: S 2763858764:2763858764(0) win 8192
00:25:07.598858 IP 195.56.67.90.https > 168.210.232.5.33160: S 1905576176:1905576176(0) ack 2763858765 win 4350
Internal Vlan, filtered on IP 168.210.232.5
00:31:46.171124 IP 168.210.232.5.33202 > 192.168.100.20.http: S 2389057240:2389057240(0) win 4380
What is the problem?
An LTM Specialist has set up a custom SNMP alert.
Which command line tool should the LTM Specialist use to test the alert?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
A server administrator notices that one server is intermittently NOT being sent any HTTP requests. The server logs display no issues. The LTM Specialist notices log entries stating the node (172.16.20.1) status cycling between down and up. The pool associated with the virtual server (10.10.1.100) has a custom HTTP monitor applied.
Which tcpdump filter will help trace the monitor?
These log entries can have different root causes:
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 1.1.1.2 port 6699
Jun 28 05:01:21 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 01071432:5: CMI peer connection established to 1.1.1.2 port 6699
Jun 28 05:01:26 LTM_A notice mcpd[27545]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: disabled, all peers are connected
Which two commands should be used to obtain additional information on these entries? (Choose two.)
A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
switch [HTTP::uri] {
"/ws1/ws.jsp" {
log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"
pool JSP
}
default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"
pool NonJSP
}
}
}
However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
What should the LTM Specialist do to resolve this?
An LTM Specialist connects to an LTM device via the serial console cable and receives unreadable output. The LTM Specialist is using the appropriate cable and connecting it to the correct serial port.
Which command should the LTM Specialist run through ssh to verify that the baud rate settings for the serial port are correct on the LTM device?
There is a fault with an LTM device load balanced trading application that resides on directly connected VLAN vlan-301. The application virtual server is 10.0.0.1:80 with trading application backend servers on subnet 192.168.0.0/25. The LTM Specialist wants to save a packet capture with complete payload for external analysis.
Which command should the LTM Specialist execute on the LTM device command line interface?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with an application configured on an LTM device. The application works properly when accessed directly via the servers; however, it does not work when accessed via the LTM device. The virtual server, 192.168.1.211:443, is configured to SNAT using the address 192.168.1.144 and references a pool with the member 192.168.10.80:443. The virtual server has no Client or Server SSL profiles associated.
Which configuration change will allow the application to function through the virtual server?
Which iRule will instruct the client's browser to avoid caching HTML server responses?
-- Exhibit –
-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is investigating reports that users are unable to perform some commands through an FTP virtual server. The LTM Specialist performs a capture on the server side of the LTM device.
What is the issue with the application?